Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Activity for Peter Taylor‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #291301 For the purposes of "each point in $X$ is in the image of exactly one such restriction $\sigma_\alpha | \overset{\circ}{\Delta}{}^n$" does the 0-simplex count as having a non-empty interior? If not, the points mapped by the vertex would seem to be exceptions.
(more)
5 days ago
Comment Post #291104 I haven't worked through it, but my first thought is that your diagram doesn't seem to use any properties of the circumcircle. I wonder whether the fact that the perpendicular bisector of CD is parallel to MD and passes through the centre of the circle will be relevant.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #290814 The FAQ says "Don't cross-post the same thing in multiple topics". I believe that "topics" is a term which generalises "question" to cover sites which have blog posts, articles, etc. Cross-posting questions across sites / networks without mentioning it is poor netiquette, but here the OP did provide ...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #290894 Yes, you're right. I don't think I've kept all of my previous Sage code so I can't try to figure out where I made the mistake, but that does open up some other ideas for extensions to $6 \times 6$.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #290894 This can be rephrased as $$(A+I)^{-1} = \frac{(1 + a_{01}^2 + a_{02}^2 + a_{12}^2)I - A + A^2}{|A+I|}$$ where $|A+I| = 1 + a_{01}^2 + a_{02}^2 + a_{12}^2$. For $4\times 4$ and $5\times 5$ it generalises respectively to $$-\frac{(1 + a_{01}^2 + a_{02}^2 + a_{03}^2 + a_{12}^2 + a_{13}^2 + a_{23}^2)(A -...
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #290864 If you want to learn advanced mathematics, the best route is to work through a textbook. If you come to a proof that you can't understand, feel free to ask a specific question about that proof. Wikipedia mathematics pages are often more helpful as a refresher on something already studied than as a re...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #290854 Question closed 2 months ago
Edit Post #290864 Question closed 2 months ago
Edit Post #290745 Post edited:
Reduced the question metainformation to that which is relevant to this site
2 months ago
Edit Post #290765 Initial revision 2 months ago
Answer A: Concrete examples of set theorists thinking independence proofs only determine provability rather than that a statement is neither true nor false?
>> …the independence of a set-theoretic assertion from ZFC tells us little about whether it holds or not in the universe. > > How can this be? If it is independent, then it cannot be proved from the axioms. Thus, one has the freedom to assume it or assume the negation, as an axiom. Why would someon...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #290642 Post edited:
Fix typo
3 months ago
Edit Post #290637 Question closed 3 months ago
Comment Post #290581 The case analysis needs to take into account the possibility of a 2-2-0-0 split. If there are 4 voters and 4 candidates then there are $4^4 = 64$ ways for them to vote.
(more)
3 months ago
Edit Post #290494 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: Is there a $(n_3)$ configuration which is not self-dual?
OEIS has A001403 Number of combinatorial configurations of type (n3). A100001 Number of self-dual combinatorial configurations of type (n3). They first differ at $n=11$. An example of a non-self-dual configuration of type $(113)$ has points $0$ to $10$ and lines $[0, 1, 2]$, $[0, 3, 4]$, $[0...
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #290157 Post edited:
Use conventional placement of binding operators
6 months ago
Comment Post #290025 More generally, when $n > m$ the sum has no support so the LHS is zero.
(more)
6 months ago
Comment Post #289814 The page you link for tau-distribution says (variables adjusted for consistency with your presentation) "In fact, this implies that $\frac{\tau_\nu^2}{\nu}$ follows the beta distribution $B(\frac12,\frac{ν − 1}2)$." Is that effectively an answer? Stats was never my strongest subject and I'm very rust...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #289811 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: How can I improve contrast of red and green, to prove Reverse Triangle Inequality?
The obvious answer to how to amplify the the difference in length between $|\vec{b}| - |\vec{r}|$ and $|\vec{b} - \vec{r}|$ is to set $r = -b$ so that one difference is zero and the other is arbitrarily large.
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #289757 I'm not sure why it's relevant that they're 16-year-olds, and that prompts me to consider that this is really a question for teachers about pedagogy rather than for mathematicians about mathematics, so this may not be the right place to ask. I've raised the scope question [on meta](https://math.codid...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #289810 Initial revision 7 months ago
Question Is mathematical pedagogy in scope?
Do we want to consider questions about how to teach mathematics in scope, or do we want to restrict questions to actually doing mathematics?
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #289760 If you think the previous question needs improving, edit the previous question rather than duplicating it with minor tweaks.
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #289760 Question closed 7 months ago
Comment Post #289671 Firstly, it wasn't my edit. I don't understand why you call it my edit after having described the situation accurately in the question. Secondly, I understood the question to be about the edit summary. If that wasn't the main point, I suggest either editing the question or asking a new one. Thirdly, ...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #289671 I wanted to approve the edit but change the edit summary to remove the mention of correctness, but this option wasn't available.
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #289518 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Picture proof for expansion of $x^n−y^n$
$$\begin{array}{c} \times & \mid & x^{n−1} & +x^{n−2}y & +\ldots & +xy^{n−2} & +y^{n−1} \\ \hline x & \mid & x^n & {\color{blue} +x^{n−1}y} & +\ldots & +x^2 y^{n−2} & {\color{green} +x y^{n−1}} \\ -y & \mid & {\color{blue} -x^{n−1}y} & -x^{n−2}y^2 & -\ldots & {\color{green} -xy^{n−1}} & -y^n \end...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #289435 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Classification for involutory real infinite series
If we look at formal power series and ignore questions of convergence for now, we can take $f(x) = \sum{i \ge 0} ai x^i$. Then the question is which sequences of $ai$ satisfy $$\sum{j \ge 0} aj \left(\sum{i \ge 0} ai x^i\right)^j = x$$ The case $a0 \neq 0$ is awkward, because we immediately get th...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #289216 What exactly do you mean by "real infinite series"? Without the surrounding context I would interpret it as a function $\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R}$, but that can't be involutory unless it's an infinite series of natural numbers, in which case specifying "real" makes no sense. Are you looking for analy...
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #289012 Maybe someone with more imagination than me can see a way, but I'm not.
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #289012 The question "But why do most answers on lotteries consider the Pr(winning jackpot in 1 play)" might be on-topic as a *meta* question, but the answer is going to be along the lines of "Because that's what the questions ask about". As to *Homo economicus*, this is a mathematics site, and while tightly...
(more)
9 months ago
Edit Post #289012 Question closed 9 months ago
Edit Post #289007 Post edited:
The escaping interactions between MarkDown and MathJax are pretty nasty. This particular combination of single and double backslashes works in the preview
9 months ago
Comment Post #288820 Yes. Consider a 3x3 grid with mines at (0,1), (1,0), (1,1) and an initial clue at (2,2).
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288767 Initial revision 10 months ago
Answer A: Should posting on Meta affect reputation?
It seems like a good thing to reward useful contributions to Meta, but probably not as much as useful contributions to Q&A. I have mixed feelings about negative scores for downvotes, but bearing in mind the use of downvotes to express disagreement with good-faith proposals I'm inclined to remove them...
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #288729 I assume that the values are integers. What are the default values and the supported bounds?
(more)
10 months ago
Comment Post #287787 I think you've missed the "(End)". The paragraph about 49 is part of [Schoenfield's original submission](https://oeis.org/history/view?seq=A309981&v=3).
(more)
10 months ago
Edit Post #288114 Post edited:
I've removed the colours in the question, so to avoid confusion I'm removing references to them
12 months ago
Edit Post #288113 Post edited:
Remove non-mathematical content and inappropriate use of mathematical markup which reduces the accessibility of the question
12 months ago
Comment Post #288113 The first question is borderline mathematical. The second question is not, so I'm going to edit to remove it.
(more)
12 months ago
Edit Post #288080 Initial revision 12 months ago
Answer A: How to intuit P(win the same lottery twice) $= p^{2}$ vs. P(win the same lottery twice | you won the lottery once) $= p$?
> It feels contradictory for P(you win the same lottery twice) $\neq$ P(you win the same lottery twice|you won the lottery once). Would you expect P(you win the lottery exactly zero times) = P(you win the lottery exactly zero times | you won the lottery once)? > Intuitively, why aren't these ...
(more)
12 months ago
Edit Post #288039 Post edited:
about 1 year ago
Edit Post #288039 Post edited:
about 1 year ago
Edit Post #288039 Post edited:
about 1 year ago