Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Formalizing proof of existence of roots of functional equation

Post

Formalizing proof of existence of roots of functional equation

+4
−0

Hey, codidact!

I've been solving for solutions to $f^n(x)=x$ where $f(x) = 4x(1-x)$ (the r=4 case of the logistic map, yes) and $f^n(x) = f(f^{n-1}(x))$ is defined recursively. Domain and range are both $[0,1]$.

I think I'm almost there - just need some logic to clear the (apparently) last hurdle.

Since $f^n(x)$ can arise from two different values of $f^{n-1}(x)$ (symmetrical about 0.5) I began to build a sort of reverse tree where I go backwards from $f^n(x)$ to $2^n$ possible values of $x$. This implies that for any $f^n(x) = k, 0 \lt k \lt 1$ there are $2^n$ distinct $x$ available to iterate on. (The $f^n(x) = 1, 0$ cases have some number of repeated roots, but that does not matter, as I am solving for equality to $x$, and 0 is a solution and I leave it at that)

I have this inkling of an idea: since there are infinite such $k$ I should be easily able to find $2^n$ values of $k$ such that $k$ is a part of ${\{x:f^n(x)=x}\}$. But this sort of reasoning seems highly inaccurate to me.

Is this even an acceptable conjecture? Is there any way I can formalize the proof along these lines?

I'd appreciate help with tags.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Attempted restatement of the problem (2 comments)
Attempted restatement of the problem
Peter Taylor‭ wrote 4 months ago

$f^n(x) - x$ is a polynomial of degree $2^n$, so it has $2^n$ roots. Is your goal essentially to prove that those roots are distinct real numbers in the interval $[0, 1)$?

zayn‭ wrote 4 months ago

Yes, exactly! Should I edit the question if this is unclear?