is arithmetic finitely consistent?

Let's take PA1 for example. From godel's 2nd incompleteness theorem, PA1 can't prove its own consistency, more specifically it can't prove that the largest consistent subset of the theory is PA1 itself.

But PA1 has infinite axioms, so can PA1 prove atleast for a given finite set of axioms ( of PA1 ) that they are consistent, specifically that no contradictional proof exists which uses only those axioms ?

Or any formal theory of arithmetic for that matter, can it prove for a finite subset of its own axioms that they are consistent ?

is a duplicate

This question has been asked before and has already been answered. It should be marked as a duplicate.

Please enter the URL of the proposed duplicate in the details field below.

not constructive

This question cannot be answered in a way that is helpful to anyone. It's not possible to learn something from possible answers, except for the solution for the specific problem of the asker.

Communities

is arithmetic finitely consistent?

1 comment thread

0 answers