Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Activity for msh210‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #286991 Yes, precisely so.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #286991 If your order is 54321 and you pick book 2 from the fourth spot, you'll put it back in the second spot, yielding 52431.
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #286991 Obviously for $n=2$ the maximum is $1$. It's not much harder to see that for $n=3$ the maximum is $3$ (just go through the cases). I ran a script to pick books at random repeatedly so I don't know for certain that I found the maximum, but the highest number I got was $7$ for $n=4$ and $15$ for $n=5...
(more)
over 1 year ago
Comment Post #286150 [cross-posted](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/4412172)
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #286140 [cross-posted](//math.stackexchange.com/q/4409542)
(more)
about 2 years ago
Comment Post #281724 @r~~ oh good point. Yes, I think so, actually.
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #280462 Yes, @celtschk .
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280204 Thank you for the comment!
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #280204 Out of curiosity, once he shows $\mathcal M$ is the identity, how does he complete the proof?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279044 -1. "Using solely the original meaning of 'unless' below" is a restrictive condition you've added in for no apparent reason.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279026 This sounds almost like the small inductive dimension.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278872 @TripleFault I don't think it would be appropriate to edit your question post to include that proof. After all, you asked whether your proof was good, I gave a good answer. If you now edit your question to make my answer nonsensical, that's unfair to me (making me look foolish) and to readers (making...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278724 What browser? I find the same happens in Chrome on my Android device but not in Chrome on Windows.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278647 These may help: https://doi.org/10.1007/11615798_4 , https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0407300
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278338 Your alternative proof for the problem my kid had is a good one, and is probably the one intended by the problemsetter. Thank you!
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278174 @Moshi https://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/TITLE.html
(more)
over 3 years ago