Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on proving relative lengths on a secant

Post

proving relative lengths on a secant

+1
−0

My kid was given this question. (Well, my statement of it actually includes some results that my kid had to find in previous parts of the question.)

Triangle $ABC$ is equilateral. $D$ is the middle of side $\overline{BC}$. $AD$ is the diameter of a circle centered at $O$. $\overline{AC}$ meets the circle at $F$. Prove that $AF=3CF$.

[I'd appreciate if someone could add a diagram. I can't at the moment.]

I can think of two ways to do this:

  1. Draw $\overline{DF}$, prove it's an altitude in triangle $ADC$, and use similar triangles to find the sidelengths.
  2. Use the fact that $DC^2=FC\cdot AC$.

Any other methods? I ask because my kid hasn't learned that latter theorem, or similar triangles.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
General comments
r~~‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Does your kid know about 30-60-90 triangles? Knowing that the short side is half the length of the hypotenuse would be enough.

msh210‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@r~~ oh good point. Yes, I think so, actually.

Skipping 1 deleted comment.

Peter Taylor‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Would I be correct in guessing that the lack of any comment on my answer is because you haven't seen the final version?