Activity for Snoopy
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Edit | Post #287664 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287720 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Proving Let (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287667 |
Yes. Adding more text will push the mentioned expression down to the next line. If I change the expression to (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287664 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287664 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287664 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287664 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287664 |
That is the answer to the second question mark in the quoted excerpt. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287667 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287667 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Extra "bar" in the post GitHub issue: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/802 I have experimented with various things but cannot get rid of an extra "bar" in my recent answer (now edited by putting the expression in another separate line to avoid the bar) on the main site: > snapshot of the mentioned post ... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287625 |
The answer to your second bullet point is NO already. (See my answer below.) You don't need to write 3 and 4, which are all based on a wrong interpretation of the phrase in 2. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287664 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287664 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287664 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287664 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287664 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: What did James Stewart mean by "the line integral reduces to an ordinary single integral in this case" ? > How do you symbolize "the line integral reduces to an ordinary single integral in this case"? (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287492 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287492 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287492 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Example of In the Wikipedia article on improper integrals, the function (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287484 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287484 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287484 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Finding the limit > Let (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287201 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287201 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287201 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287201 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287201 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287201 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How can 3/1 ≡ 1/(1/3), when left side features merely integers, but right side features a repetend? > ... it's impossible to measure and cut anything physical at a repetend. This is incorrect. Given a segment with (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287160 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287160 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287160 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Why can't we conclude the extrema property of a function from its quadratic approximation when the discriminant is zero? Suppose (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287006 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287003 |
Thank you for your answer! I see from your proof that the crucial step is the fact that for prime (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287006 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Proving that Inspired by Derek Elkins's excellent answer, I have the following proof. By the assumption, we have (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287002 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Proving that Problem: Suppose (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #286985 |
Corrected. Thanks. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #286985 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #286985 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #286985 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #286985 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
Question | — |
Given two angles of a triangle, finding an angle formed by a median > Problem: Suppose in (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |