Activity for trichoplax
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comment | Post #288168 |
It would be useful to have this answered by adding parentheses to the formula so it is immediately clear. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #288168 |
Suggested edit: Missing space (more) |
helpful | almost 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #288022 |
I agree this question should be closed. Analysing a long article seems a better fit for a blog than an answer on this site.
As Peter Taylor pointed out, it is possible to profit from some lotteries. However, lotteries close loopholes over time, particularly loopholes that have been made public. It... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287820 |
Post edited: Remove redundant commentary on the question |
— | about 2 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #287820 |
Suggested edit: Remove redundant commentary on the question (more) |
helpful | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287761 |
Hovering over the voting buttons and vote counts currently shows the score when in a question page, but it doesn't yet show on question list pages. I've [raised this on Meta](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/287763). Feel free to raise the other ideas on Meta too (I'd guess the [main Codidact Meta](ht... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287761 |
Thanks for spotting this. I've raised an [issue on GitHub](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/982). (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287761 |
Concerning dark mode, that's something I'd really like to see too. It's not currently a high priority but it does have a [request on Meta](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/275838) and a [GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/565). (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287761 |
I agree a fractional score would be horribly confusing (especially as not all Codidact communities are maths based). An integer percentage might work better but could give the impression of far more voters than there really were.
I partly like the idea of the net votes in a big font and the up and... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287761 |
I share this impression - I raise a lot of issues (some important, some trivial) and see frequent fixes and feature implementations, which encourages me to continue raising whatever I notice. It's really useful to have your first impressions. I hope you'll continue to raise things. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287761 |
Whereas on SE answers and questions are sorted by net votes (upvotes minus downvotes), here they are [sorted by score](https://meta.codidact.com/help/scoring) (a modified Wilson score). There has been discussion of [displaying the score instead of the upvotes and downvotes](https://meta.codidact.com/... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287625 |
Post edited: Tidying |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287720 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | about 2 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #287720 |
Suggested edit: Typo (more) |
helpful | about 2 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #287625 |
Suggested edit: Tidying (more) |
helpful | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287664 |
Thank you - makes sense now. I was misinterpreting the quoted equation as part of the question, rather than a suggested answer. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287668 |
Post edited: Be more specific about the mobile behaviour |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287668 |
Post edited: Mention mobile behaviour for the test paragraph |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287668 |
Post edited: Typos |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287664 |
I don't understand the "NO" directly after the quote block. Is it responding to the quoted paragraph, or to some other part of the original question? (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287668 |
Post edited: Mention paragraphs wrap |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287668 |
Post edited: Mention scrollbar only visible on hover |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287668 |
Post edited: Edit following discovering that the behaviour is different after I save |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287668 |
Post edited: Test wide inline MathJax |
— | about 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287667 |
In your experiments, did you try adding more text to the paragraph, perhaps a word or two to push the $x\mapsto f(x,0)$ further to the right? It might be useful to see whether this results in it moving down to the next line, or just moving further right, out of view. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287668 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Extra "bar" in the post Probably a scroll bar This appears to be a horizontal scroll bar. You can confirm this by attempting to drag it left and right with the mouse (or finger on touch screen). The paragraph above it should move correspondingly. Affected operating systems and browsers I do not see the bar when viewing... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287651 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Posts with math are very, very tall in the feed Fading out the content This only addresses MathJax in the content preview, not MathJax in titles. If it is decided to go with a fixed maximum height for a question preview, here's a possible solution for the problem mentioned, that equations could be cut in half: Have a region at the bottom of... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
Edit | Post #287419 |
Post edited: Update to match the confirmations made in the comments |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #287419 |
I've suggested an edit to make the question show what you have confirmed in the comments. I've also suggested putting "length" in quotation marks to help a first time reader spot that this is a non-standard definition of length.
I think it might be easier to understand if the definition used popul... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Suggested Edit | Post #287419 |
Suggested edit: Update to match the confirmations made in the comments (more) |
helpful | over 2 years ago |
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →