Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on What's mathematically fallacious with Edvin Hiltner's Lotterycodex patterns, to maximize your chance of winning lotteries?

Post

What's mathematically fallacious with Edvin Hiltner's Lotterycodex patterns, to maximize your chance of winning lotteries? [closed]

+1
−4

Closed as unclear by Mithical‭ on Apr 4, 2023 at 10:16

This question cannot be answered in its current form, because critical information is missing.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

I distrust Edvin Hiltner's guidance, but for skepticism unrelated to math. 1. This website is asking for payment in USD for its "patterns". Buyer beware! A fool and his money are soon parted.

If this alleged gambit worked, then

  1. many more lottery players would tout it. Lotteries would foil it.

  2. why would the author publicize it, and abandon his/her own secret advantage? Analogously, most hedge funds are "black-box operations" and keep their details "proprietary".

But my skepticism isn't mathematical, because I'm too unskilled at probability. Kindly debunk this flimflam mathematically?

I ask this to protect and inform the public against this swindle. I am not affiliated with, or backed by, this possible website.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Possible smaller questions (1 comment)
Mandel (3 comments)
Possible smaller questions
trichoplax‭ wrote over 1 year ago

I agree this question should be closed. Analysing a long article seems a better fit for a blog than an answer on this site.

As Peter Taylor pointed out, it is possible to profit from some lotteries. However, lotteries close loopholes over time, particularly loopholes that have been made public. It is possible, but unlikely, that a method you find published online will be effective.

I have read through this particular method. It is not effective. If you are looking to profit from a lottery, this method is not going to help you.

If you see this more as an exercise in understanding why a claim is false, then you may find it useful to look at a specific claim and try to work out what is wrong with it. If you get stuck, asking about one specific claim will make a better question to post here than asking about the whole article (which contains a variety of false claims and contradictions).

For example, you could look at the claim that choosing 3 odd and 3 even numbers is beneficial.