Activity for bharathk98
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #296617 |
Post edited: |
— | 19 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296617 |
Post edited: |
— | 19 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296617 |
Post edited: |
— | 19 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296617 |
Post edited: Made post easier to read |
— | 19 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296617 |
Post edited: Added that $\mathcal{A}(A)$ is an index set |
— | 19 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296617 |
Post edited: Added that $\mathcal{A}(A)$ is an index set |
— | 19 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296617 |
Post edited: |
— | 19 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296617 |
Post edited: Made the post easier to understand and read. |
— | 19 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296617 | Initial revision | — | 19 days ago |
| Question | — |
How do we simplify Definition 2 in this post (i.e., the extended mean w.r.t. Hausdorff measure in its dimension)? Let us define the following: > Definition 1. (The Mean of $f$) Suppose that > > $\dim{\mathrm{H}}(\cdot)$ is the Hausdorff dimension > $\mathcal{H}^{\dim{\mathrm{H}}(\cdot)}(\cdot)$ is the Hausdorff measure in its dimension on the Borel $\sigma$-algebra > the integral is defined, w.r.t. the H... (more) |
— | 19 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296572 |
Post edited: Changed the link of the concept paper |
— | 29 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296572 |
Post edited: Corrected Function G one last time |
— | 30 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296572 |
Post edited: Made the beggening easier to read |
— | 30 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296572 |
Post edited: Fixed the function G |
— | 30 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296572 |
Post edited: Fixed the function G |
— | 30 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296572 |
Post edited: |
— | 30 days ago |
| Comment | Post #296572 |
If this post is too annoying, you can contact the moderators to block me from this website. (more) |
— | 30 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296572 |
Post edited: |
— | 30 days ago |
| Edit | Post #296572 | Initial revision | — | 30 days ago |
| Question | — |
Is my "average" of this function $\mathcal{G}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ non-zero and finite? (I tried to make the post as self-contained as possible. If you need to read the concept paper, I refer to the exact pages needed to find the rigorous version(s) of each definition in the post.) Organization: The post is organized in the following order, 1. the motivation of $\mathcal{G}:\mathb... (more) |
— | 30 days ago |
| Edit | Post #295436 |
Post edited: |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #295469 |
u/PeterTaylor I did not intend to pit the users against eachother. I wanted the truth which I won't be able to determine myself (I know my limitations). Clemens was overexaggerating and was disrespecful. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
| Comment | Post #296073 |
@#117674 My posts are still being downvoted which is fine, but why are they doing this now rather than before. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #296081 |
@#8045 Also, no one is saying why the post is unclear. They just downvote without a particular reason. Even Clemens was okay with my questions until recently. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #296081 |
@#8045 I understand it is from different users, but why are my downvotes so sudden. This could have happened months ago. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #295457 |
@#117674 I'll stop bothering you. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Edit | Post #295434 |
Post edited: |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #295457 |
There is a chance that some of these research papers and textbooks in your answer are outdated.
**Edit:** Since your answer focuses on the title of the question, what about the question in the post. I chose the title, since I didn't know how else to summarize the question. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #296081 |
@#117674 I understand. If I continue posting similar questions, you can close them. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #296081 |
@#117674 I will try to stop asking clone questions. It's been weeks, maybe 1-2 months since I asked what you consider a clone question.
I'm slowly improving. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #296073 |
@#117674 I apologize for the accusation. I was wondering why all the sudden people were downvoting my posts.
I'll leave you alone. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #296073 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
| Question | — |
Serial Downvoting: Is a user allowed to downvote all your posts, if they are deemed low quality? I had an argument with this user. Now, when I post, someone is downvoting this post and older posts. Question: Is a user allowed to downvote most of my posts, if they deem it low quality? (In stack exchange, the former is called "serial downvoting".) (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #296061 |
(**Edit:** I edited this comment. See the most recent version.)
@#36356 Sorry, I meant the "2-d volume" is the area and "$y=0$" is the x-axis. This means whenever $\lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on the Borel $\sigma$-algebra, then both $\int_{a}^{b}\mathcal{G}(x)\ d\lambda=+\infty$ and $\int... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #296061 |
Post edited: |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #296061 |
Post edited: |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #296061 |
Post edited: |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #296061 |
Post edited: |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #296061 |
Post edited: |
— | 5 months ago |
| Edit | Post #296061 | Initial revision | — | 5 months ago |
| Question | — |
Averaging an Explicit, Non-Lebesgue Integrable, and Unbounded Function That Is Defined Without The Axiom of Choice Motivation: The function below has an undefined mean, no matter how much we extend the Lebesgue or Hausdorff measure. Properties of the Function: We want an explicit, unbounded $\mathcal{G}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ (without the axiom of choice) such that: 1. The restriction of $\mathcal{... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #295469 |
I never said I was intellectually superior. Did you read the reddit posts! (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #295469 |
He could be more respecful. He doesn't have to constantly splurge insults!
Trash talk has no place in mathematics. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #295469 |
No, a redditor kept calling my work nonsense. Not on this account.
How did you know the redditor and I are arguing? Have you been stalking me? (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #295469 |
@#117674 According to a user on Reddit, you can't just say "an everywhere surjective function whose Lebesgue measure is undefined on any interval", you have to say "an everywhere surjective function whose Lebesgue pushforward measure is undefined".
How can I put this in a abstract? (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #295427 |
@#117674 I know you're done with me, but I made some [changes](https://math.codidact.com/posts/295524). If this is not enough, does that mean you are not answering the question? (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Edit | Post #295524 |
Post edited: Fixed the post |
— | 7 months ago |
| Edit | Post #295524 |
Post edited: Fixed the post |
— | 7 months ago |
| Edit | Post #295524 |
Post edited: |
— | 7 months ago |
| Comment | Post #295427 |
@#117674 According to [this user](https://www.reddit.com/r/puremathematics/comments/1rfilts/comment/o7xjffd/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button), Definition 2.2 of [this post](https://math.codidact.com/posts/295524) doesn't give what I want. (H... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |