Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

The derivatives of a function at a boundary point

+3
−0

I have a function $f \colon [0, L[ \, \to \mathbb{R}$ and I want to use the derivatives of arbitrary high orders of this function at zero. The function is defined on the half-open interval $[0, L[ \, \ni 0$, for an $L >0$.

Typically the derivative is only defined on interior points of an interval where the function is defined. How can I rigorously argue that I can actually use $f^{(n)}(0)$ for all, or all high, values of $n$?

  1. If I consider $[0, L[$ as the entire space, then the best linear approximation to $f$ at $0$ just happens to be the usual derivative.
  2. If I can argue for analytic continuation of $f$ to a slightly larger, open interval, then all's fine.
  3. Or maybe calculate $f'(\varepsilon)$ and take $\varepsilon \to 0$.

Are these feasible tactics to use here? When are they a good idea? Any others that could help here?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitney_extension_theorem (2 comments)

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+0
−0

The endpoint fails to be an "interior" point only when the space $\left[0,L\right[$ is embedded in a larger space. If a function is defined on a certain domain, one may take the value of the derivative of the function $f$ at a point $a$ in the domain to be $$ f'(a) = \lim_{x~\to~a \atop x~\in~\text{domain}} \frac{f(x)-f(a)}{x-a}. $$

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+2
−0

Your question is better phrased and answered in Whitney's paper: Analytic extensions of differentiable functions defined in closed sets.

Here is an excerpt from the introduction section of the paper, which can be seen from the given AMS link:

Image_alt_text

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »