Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

If both $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)$ and $\lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)$ exist, then $\lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=0$.

+3
−0

Question. Let $f:\mathbf{R}\to\mathbf{R}$ be a differentiable function. If both the limits $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)$ exist, how does one show that $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=0$?

Note. This statement is intuitively obvious: if $f$ has a horizontal asymptote, then the slope of the graph goes to zero as the graph approaches the asymptote.

It seems to me that proving by contradiction is easier to work with than a direct proof where one needs to estimate the size of the derivative. I will write my own answer below. Other perspectives are welcome.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+2
−0

Idea. If $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)\ne 0$, then for large enough $x$, $f'(x)$ is bounded away from $0$, which implies by the mean value theorem that $|f(x+1)-f(x)|$ is bounded away from $0$. But $|f(x+1)-f(x)|$ must also be small for large $x$ since $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)$ exists. One has a contradiction.

To formalize the idea above, here is the proof.

Proof.

Suppose $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=L$ for some real numbers $L_0$ and $L$. We show that $L=0$.

For the sake of argument, suppose $L>0$. Then it follows from the limit definition that there exists some positive real number $M>0$ such that for every $x\ge M$, $$ \frac{L}{2}<f'(x)<\frac{3L}{2}. $$ which implies (for every $x\ge M$) by the mean value theorem, $$ f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(\xi_x)>\frac{L}{2}>0,\tag{1} $$ where $\xi_x$ is some real number between $x$ and $x+1$.

On the other hand, since $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$, for large enough $x$ that is greater than $M$, one has $$ |f(x+1)-f(x)|<|f(x+1)-L_0|+|f(x)-L_0|<\frac{L}{2}, $$ which contradicts (1).

Similarly, one can argue that $L<0$ is impossible.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »