Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#5: Post edited by user avatar Snoopy‭ · 2024-01-17T12:52:50Z (4 months ago)
  • **Idea.** If $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)\ne 0$, then for large enough $x$, $f'(x)$ is bounded away from $0$, which implies by the mean value theorem that $|f(x+1)-f(x)|$ is bounded away from $0$. But $|f(x+1)-f(x)|$ must also be small for large $x$ since $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)$ exists. One has a contradiction.
  • To formalize the idea above, here is the proof.
  • **Proof.**
  • Suppose $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=L$ for some real numbers $L_0$ and $L$. We show that $L=0$.
  • For the sake of argument, suppose $L>0$. Then it follows from the limit definition that there exists some positive real number $M>0$ such that for every $x\ge M$,
  • $$
  • \frac{L}{2}<f'(x)<\frac{3L}{2}.
  • $$
  • which implies (for every $x\ge M$) by the [mean value theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_value_theorem),
  • $$
  • f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(\xi_x)>\frac{L}{2}>0,\tag{1}
  • $$
  • where $\xi_x$ is some real number depends on $x$.
  • On the other hand, since $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$, for large enough $x$ that is greater than $M$, one has
  • $$
  • |f(x+1)-f(x)|<|f(x+1)-L_0|+|f(x)-L_0|<\frac{L}{2},
  • $$
  • which contradicts (1).
  • Similarly, one can argue that $L<0$ is impossible.
  • **Idea.** If $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)\ne 0$, then for large enough $x$, $f'(x)$ is bounded away from $0$, which implies by the mean value theorem that $|f(x+1)-f(x)|$ is bounded away from $0$. But $|f(x+1)-f(x)|$ must also be small for large $x$ since $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)$ exists. One has a contradiction.
  • To formalize the idea above, here is the proof.
  • **Proof.**
  • Suppose $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=L$ for some real numbers $L_0$ and $L$. We show that $L=0$.
  • For the sake of argument, suppose $L>0$. Then it follows from the limit definition that there exists some positive real number $M>0$ such that for every $x\ge M$,
  • $$
  • \frac{L}{2}<f'(x)<\frac{3L}{2}.
  • $$
  • which implies (for every $x\ge M$) by the [mean value theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_value_theorem),
  • $$
  • f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(\xi_x)>\frac{L}{2}>0,\tag{1}
  • $$
  • where $\xi_x$ is some real number between $x$ and $x+1$.
  • On the other hand, since $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$, for large enough $x$ that is greater than $M$, one has
  • $$
  • |f(x+1)-f(x)|<|f(x+1)-L_0|+|f(x)-L_0|<\frac{L}{2},
  • $$
  • which contradicts (1).
  • Similarly, one can argue that $L<0$ is impossible.
#4: Post edited by user avatar Snoopy‭ · 2024-01-14T12:41:45Z (4 months ago)
  • Suppose $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=L$ for some real numbers $L_0$ and $L$. We show that $L=0$.
  • For the sake of argument, suppose $L>0$. Then it follows from the limit definition that there exists some positive real number $M>0$ such that for every $x\ge M$,
  • $$
  • \frac{L}{2}<f'(x)<\frac{3L}{2}.
  • $$
  • which implies (for every $x\ge M$) by the [mean value theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_value_theorem),
  • $$
  • f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(\xi_x)>\frac{L}{2}>0,\tag{1}
  • $$
  • where $\xi_x$ is some real number depends on $x$.
  • On the other hand, since $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$, for large enough $x$ that is greater than $M$, one has
  • $$
  • |f(x+1)-f(x)|<|f(x+1)-L_0|+|f(x)-L_0|<\frac{L}{2},
  • $$
  • which contradicts (1).
  • Similarly, one can argue that $L<0$ is impossible.
  • **Idea.** If $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)\ne 0$, then for large enough $x$, $f'(x)$ is bounded away from $0$, which implies by the mean value theorem that $|f(x+1)-f(x)|$ is bounded away from $0$. But $|f(x+1)-f(x)|$ must also be small for large $x$ since $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)$ exists. One has a contradiction.
  • To formalize the idea above, here is the proof.
  • **Proof.**
  • Suppose $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=L$ for some real numbers $L_0$ and $L$. We show that $L=0$.
  • For the sake of argument, suppose $L>0$. Then it follows from the limit definition that there exists some positive real number $M>0$ such that for every $x\ge M$,
  • $$
  • \frac{L}{2}<f'(x)<\frac{3L}{2}.
  • $$
  • which implies (for every $x\ge M$) by the [mean value theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_value_theorem),
  • $$
  • f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(\xi_x)>\frac{L}{2}>0,\tag{1}
  • $$
  • where $\xi_x$ is some real number depends on $x$.
  • On the other hand, since $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$, for large enough $x$ that is greater than $M$, one has
  • $$
  • |f(x+1)-f(x)|<|f(x+1)-L_0|+|f(x)-L_0|<\frac{L}{2},
  • $$
  • which contradicts (1).
  • Similarly, one can argue that $L<0$ is impossible.
#3: Post edited by user avatar Snoopy‭ · 2024-01-13T23:20:58Z (4 months ago)
  • Suppose $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=L$ for some real numbers $L_0$ and $L$. We show that $L=0$.
  • For the sake of argument, suppose $L>0$. Then it follows from the limit definition that there exists some positive real number $M>0$ such that for every $x\ge M$,
  • $$
  • \frac{L}{2}<f'(x)<\frac{3L}{2}.
  • $$
  • which implies (for every $x\ge M$),
  • $$
  • f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(\xi_x)>\frac{L}{2}>0,\tag{1}
  • $$
  • where $\xi_x$ is some real number depends on $x$.
  • On the other hand, since $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$, for large enough $x$ that is greater than $M$, one has
  • $$
  • |f(x+1)-f(x)|<|f(x+1)-L_0|+|f(x)-L_0|<\frac{L}{2},
  • $$
  • which contradicts (1).
  • Similarly, one can argue that $L<0$ is impossible.
  • Suppose $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=L$ for some real numbers $L_0$ and $L$. We show that $L=0$.
  • For the sake of argument, suppose $L>0$. Then it follows from the limit definition that there exists some positive real number $M>0$ such that for every $x\ge M$,
  • $$
  • \frac{L}{2}<f'(x)<\frac{3L}{2}.
  • $$
  • which implies (for every $x\ge M$) by the [mean value theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_value_theorem),
  • $$
  • f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(\xi_x)>\frac{L}{2}>0,\tag{1}
  • $$
  • where $\xi_x$ is some real number depends on $x$.
  • On the other hand, since $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$, for large enough $x$ that is greater than $M$, one has
  • $$
  • |f(x+1)-f(x)|<|f(x+1)-L_0|+|f(x)-L_0|<\frac{L}{2},
  • $$
  • which contradicts (1).
  • Similarly, one can argue that $L<0$ is impossible.
#2: Post edited by user avatar Snoopy‭ · 2024-01-13T23:19:33Z (4 months ago)
  • Suppose $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=L$ for some real numbers $L_0$ and $L$. We show that $L=0$.
  • For the sake of argument, suppose $L>0$. Then it follows from the limit definition that there exists some positive real number $M>0$ such that for every $x\ge M$,
  • $$
  • \frac{L}{2}<f'(x)<\frac{3L}{2}.
  • $$
  • which implies
  • $$
  • f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(\xi_x)>\frac{L}{2}>0,
  • $$
  • where $\xi_x$ is some real number depends on $x$.
  • On the other hand, since $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$, for large enough $x$, one has
  • $$
  • |f(x+1)-f(x)|<|f(x+1)-L_0|+|f(x)-L_0|<\frac{L}{2},
  • $$
  • which is a contradiction.
  • Similarly, one can argue that $L<0$ is impossible.
  • Suppose $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=L$ for some real numbers $L_0$ and $L$. We show that $L=0$.
  • For the sake of argument, suppose $L>0$. Then it follows from the limit definition that there exists some positive real number $M>0$ such that for every $x\ge M$,
  • $$
  • \frac{L}{2}<f'(x)<\frac{3L}{2}.
  • $$
  • which implies (for every $x\ge M$),
  • $$
  • f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(\xi_x)>\frac{L}{2}>0,\tag{1}
  • $$
  • where $\xi_x$ is some real number depends on $x$.
  • On the other hand, since $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$, for large enough $x$ that is greater than $M$, one has
  • $$
  • |f(x+1)-f(x)|<|f(x+1)-L_0|+|f(x)-L_0|<\frac{L}{2},
  • $$
  • which contradicts (1).
  • Similarly, one can argue that $L<0$ is impossible.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Snoopy‭ · 2024-01-13T23:15:17Z (4 months ago)
Suppose $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=L$ for some real numbers $L_0$ and $L$. We show that $L=0$. 

For the sake of argument, suppose $L>0$. Then it follows from the limit definition that there exists some positive real number $M>0$ such that for every $x\ge M$, 
$$
\frac{L}{2}<f'(x)<\frac{3L}{2}.
$$
which implies
$$
f(x+1)-f(x)=f'(\xi_x)>\frac{L}{2}>0,
$$
where $\xi_x$ is some real number depends on $x$. 

On the other hand, since $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=L_0$, for large enough $x$, one has
$$
|f(x+1)-f(x)|<|f(x+1)-L_0|+|f(x)-L_0|<\frac{L}{2},
$$
which is a contradiction. 

Similarly, one can argue that $L<0$ is impossible.