Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#3: Post edited by user avatar Grove‭ · 2021-01-08T11:01:02Z (over 3 years ago)
  • As you seem to know (the $10\times 10\\% \neq 100\\%$-stuff - but continue doing anyway) and celtschk's answer shows you can't add the probabilities like that. (The events aren't independent)
  • The expected number of upgrades are the same, but what you really need to weigh against each other is the chance of not getting an upgrade at all ($70\\%$ if you chose the $30\\%$ strategy, $72{,}9\\%$ if you use the $10\\%$ strategy three times, and the possibility of getting more upgrades ($0$ if you use the $30\\% strategy, $2{,}8\\%$ if you use the $10\\%$ strategy three times - and I did my math correctly). All of that is assuming you don't have any other use (like saving it) for the gold and chose to apply the $10\\%$ strategy three times.
  • As you seem to know (the $10\times 10\\% \neq 100\\%$-stuff - but continue doing anyway) and celtschk's answer shows you can't add the probabilities like that. (The events aren't independent)
  • The expected number of upgrades are the same, but what you really need to weigh against each other is the chance of not getting an upgrade at all ($70\\%$ if you chose the $30\\%$ strategy, $72{,}9\\%$ if you use the $10\\%$ strategy three times, and the possibility of getting more upgrades ($0$ if you use the $30\\%$ strategy, $2{,}8\\%$ if you use the $10\\%$ strategy three times - and I did my math correctly). All of that is assuming you don't have any other use (like saving it) for the gold and chose to apply the $10\\%$ strategy three times.
#2: Post edited by user avatar Grove‭ · 2021-01-08T11:00:27Z (over 3 years ago)
  • As you seem to know (the $10\times 10\\% \neq 100\\%$-stuff - but continue doing anyway) and celtschk's answer shows you can't add the probabilities like that. (The events aren't independent)
  • The expected number of upgrades are the same, but what you really need to weigh against each other is the chance of not getting an upgrade at all ($70\\%$ if you chose the $30\\%$ strategy, $72{,}9\\%$ if you use the $10\\%$ strategy three times, and the possibility of getting more upgrades ($0$ if you use the $30% strategy, $2{,}8\\%$ if you use the $10\\%$ strategy three times - and I did my math correctly). All of that is assuming you don't have any other use (like saving it) for the gold and chose to apply the $10\\%$ strategy three times.
  • As you seem to know (the $10\times 10\\% \neq 100\\%$-stuff - but continue doing anyway) and celtschk's answer shows you can't add the probabilities like that. (The events aren't independent)
  • The expected number of upgrades are the same, but what you really need to weigh against each other is the chance of not getting an upgrade at all ($70\\%$ if you chose the $30\\%$ strategy, $72{,}9\\%$ if you use the $10\\%$ strategy three times, and the possibility of getting more upgrades ($0$ if you use the $30\\% strategy, $2{,}8\\%$ if you use the $10\\%$ strategy three times - and I did my math correctly). All of that is assuming you don't have any other use (like saving it) for the gold and chose to apply the $10\\%$ strategy three times.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Grove‭ · 2021-01-08T10:54:56Z (over 3 years ago)
As you seem to know (the $10\times 10\\% \neq 100\\%$-stuff - but continue doing anyway) and celtschk's answer shows you can't add the probabilities like that. (The events aren't independent)

The expected number of upgrades are the same, but what you really need to weigh against each other is the chance of not getting an upgrade at all ($70\\%$ if you chose the $30\\%$ strategy, $72{,}9\\%$ if you use the $10\\%$ strategy three times, and the possibility of getting more upgrades ($0$ if you use the $30% strategy, $2{,}8\\%$ if you use the $10\\%$ strategy three times - and I did my math correctly). All of that is assuming you don't have any other use (like saving it) for the gold and chose to apply the $10\\%$ strategy three times.