Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Are these introductory logic textbooks wrong to teach ‘unless’ = ‘or’?

Post

Are these introductory logic textbooks wrong to teach ‘unless’ = ‘or’? [duplicate]

+1
−3

Closed as duplicate by Peter Taylor‭ on Jan 26, 2024 at 10:16

This question has been addressed elsewhere. See: Why does “unless” mean “if not”?

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

Colin Fine answered that

Unless" does not equal "or" 'directly and intuitively'.

This contradicts the textbooks beneath. Who is correct?

Usually, "P unless Q" is "symbolized as P ∨ Q. Stephen Cole Kleene, Mathematical logic (1967 - Dover ed 2002), page 64.

Lande N.P. Classical logic and its rabbit-holes: A first course (2013), pages 55-7.

The wedge symbol is used to translate “or” and “unless.” A previous chapter explained that “unless” is equivalent in meaning to “if not.” This equivalence holds in propositional logic as well, but in propositional logic it is usually simpler to equate “unless” with “or.” For example, the statement “You won’t graduate unless you pass freshman English” is equivalent to “Either you pass freshman English or you won’t graduate” and also to “If you don’t pass freshman English, then you won’t graduate.” As the next section demonstrates, the wedge symbol has the meaning of “and/or”—that is, “or” in the inclusive sense. Although “or” and “unless” are sometimes used in an exclusive sense, the wedge is usually used to translate them as well.

Hurley P. A Concise Introduction to Logic (13 edn, 2018), page 319.

Translate “unless” as “or.”

Gensler H. Introduction to Logic (3 edn 2017), 132.

In addition, the word “unless” sometimes functions like the word “or.” For example, the statement “You can’t go to the party unless you clean your room,” can be rewritten as “Either you clean your room or you can’t go to the party.”

Baronett S. Logic (5 edn 2022), 318

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Plagiarised from https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/27168/are-logic-textbooks-wrong-to... (1 comment)
An intro to logic is not a linguistics text (1 comment)
An intro to logic is not a linguistics text
Derek Elkins‭ wrote 11 months ago

This question has more or less been asked here: https://math.codidact.com/posts/279044 and my answer there captures pretty much what I would say here. Nevertheless, to answer the precise question here, the textbooks are wrong, at least when taken out of context. They are simply doing linguistics but in an almost offensively over-simplified manner. As such, these "rules" often fail and almost always lose something from the original intent. The dual scenario would be something like a linguistics textbook teaching people that two polynomials are equal when they agree when evaluated 0, 1, and 2. This actually does suffice for quadratic polynomials over reals, say, but it is not generally true nor does it respect or even acknowledge the subtleties that can arise in the theory of polynomials.