Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on How does $P(C > D \mid C = 2) \neq P(C > D \mid C \neq 2)$ prove that B > C depends on C > D?

Post

How does $P(C > D \mid C = 2) \neq P(C > D \mid C \neq 2)$ prove that B > C depends on C > D?

+0
−0

I grok that $\color{limegreen}{P(C > D \mid C = 2) = P(D = 1 \mid C = 6) = 1/2}$, and $\color{red}{P(C > D \mid C \neq 2) = P(C > D \mid C = 6) = 1}$. But I don't grok the last sentence in the quotation below, colored in blue. How do these two probabilities prove that B > C DEPENDS ON C > D?

  1. Consider four nonstandard dice (the Efron dice), whose sides are labeled as follows (the 6 sides on each die are equally likely).

A: 4; 4; 4; 4; 0; 0
B: 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3
C: 6; 6; 2; 2; 2; 2
D: 5; 5; 5; 1; 1; 1

These four dice are each rolled once. Let A be the result for die A, B be the result for die B, etc.

(a) Find P(A > B), P(B > C), P(C > D), and P(D > A).

(b) Is the event A > B independent of the event B > C? Is the event B > C independent of the event C > D? Explain.

Solution:

Image alt text

Blitzstein, Introduction to Probability (2019 2 edn), Ch 2, Exercise 30, p 88. pp 13-14 in the publicly downloadable PDF of curbed solutions.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

As it states and you can derive, $B > C$ is logically equivalent to $C = 2$ in this scenario. Thus th... (1 comment)
As it states and you can derive, $B > C$ is logically equivalent to $C = 2$ in this scenario. Thus th...
Derek Elkins‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

As it states and you can derive, $B > C$ is logically equivalent to $C = 2$ in this scenario. Thus the expressions $P(C > D \mid C = 2)$ and $P(C > D \mid C \neq 2)$ are the same as $P(C > D \mid B > C)$ and $P(C > D \mid B \not> C)$ respectively. If $C > D$ was independent of $B > C$, then these expressions should both be equal to $P(C > D)$ and thus be the same. They're not so $C > D$ is not independent of $B > C$.