Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on How can Cross Multiplication be intuited or pictured?

Post

How can Cross Multiplication be intuited or pictured? [closed]

+0
−3

Closed as unclear by Peter Taylor‭ on Nov 27, 2021 at 20:58

This question cannot be answered in its current form, because critical information is missing.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

Image alt text

I already know, I'm NOT asking about, the algebra. It's NOT intuitive why 3 pears x 4 tangelos = 6 quinces x 2 riberries $\iff$ 3 pears/6 quinces = 2 riberries/4 tangelos.

I stumbled the picture below, but how does it proffer intuition?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

What's the question? (2 comments)
I suspect you were wondered to see the $\frac{square}{star}=\frac{circle}{triangle}$ (1 comment)
What's the question?
Peter Taylor‭ wrote over 2 years ago

If the question is "Why does dividing two equal things by the same thing give two equal things" then I'm not sure why that isn't intuitive already. Separately, the first image gives a false statement (because you always need to be wary of the special case of division by zero), and I'm not sure what the second image is about.

Chgg Clou‭ wrote over 2 years ago

I have the same question as https://math.stackexchange.com/a/2667399, but I'm seeking a better explanation than cakes and pieces of cake.