Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on Solely reputable textbooks ought be cited.

Post

Solely reputable textbooks ought be cited.

+1
−7

There's one user who keeps posting from some Indo or Indian textbook on calculus that doesn't have any English. But he speaks English just fine.

He doesn't even bother to cite page numbers or the textbook's details....a clear violation of academic bibliography. Why doesn't that user use an illustrious textbook on calculus when there are so many?!? I don't like these questions from nameless, shifty books.

I actually like questions based on renowned textbooks, because this shows that students are working off and standing on giant shoulders!

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Orthogonal issues (1 comment)
Are you talking about me? (1 comment)
Orthogonal issues
Peter Taylor‭ wrote over 2 years ago

You seem to be amalgamating two orthogonal issues: citing the source of the material which the question is about, and establishing some kind of whitelist of acceptable sources. IMO the first is a reasonable issue to raise and the second is an unreasonable suggestion, but the discussion would be clearer if it were narrowed to just one issue.