Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#3: Post edited by user avatar clemens‭ · 2026-05-22T11:53:40Z (4 months ago)
  • I confess I don't fully understand this question (I await further clarification), but in general dualization is not that complicated. If $P$ is the dual of $Q$ it just means that it acts on $\bot$ the same way that $Q$ acts on $\top$, and vice versa. So whenever you have $P$ (say, a quantifier), it's easy to find its dual: just define $Q(x_1,x_2,…) := ¬P(¬x_1,¬x_2,…)$.
  • E.g. let's say we want to find the dual of "there exist countably many $x$ such that…" ($\exists^{\aleph_0} x…$). The dual would be $¬\exists^{\aleph_0}x ¬…$ "there do not exist countably many $x$ such that not…". This expression expands easily to "for all $x$ (except perhaps either a finite or uncountable number of different $x$), …". Thus we have found the dual of the quantifier $\exists^{\aleph_0} x$!
  • I hope this clarifies the particular applications under consideration in the OP.
  • I confess I don't fully understand this question (I await further clarification), but in general dualization is not that complicated. If $P$ is the dual of $Q$ it just means that it acts on $\bot$ the same way that $Q$ acts on $\top$, and vice versa. So whenever you have $P$ (say, a quantifier), it's easy to find its dual: just define $Q(x_1,x_2,…) := ¬P(¬x_1,¬x_2,…)$.
  • E.g. let's say we want to find the dual of "there exist countably many $x$ such that…" ($\exists^{\aleph_0} x…$). The dual would be $¬\exists^{\aleph_0}x ¬…$ "there do not exist countably many $x$ such that not…". This expression expands easily to "for all $x$ (except perhaps either a finite or uncountable number of different $x$), …". Thus we have found the dual of the quantifier $\exists^{\aleph_0} x$!
#2: Post edited by user avatar clemens‭ · 2026-05-22T11:52:44Z (4 months ago)
  • I confess I don't fully understand this question (I await clarification), but in general dualization is not that complicated. If $P$ is the dual of $Q$ it just means that it acts on $\bot$ the same way that $Q$ acts on $\top$, and vice versa. So whenever you have $P$ (say, a quantifier), it's easy to find its dual: just define $Q(x_1,x_2,…) := ¬P(¬x_1,¬x_2,…)$.
  • E.g. let's say we want to find the dual of "there exist countably many $x$ such that…" ($\exists^{\aleph_0} x…$). The dual would be $¬\exists^{\aleph_0}x ¬…$ "there do not exist countably many $x$ such that not…". This expression expands easily to "for all $x$ (except perhaps either a finite or uncountable number of different $x$), …". Thus we have found the dual of the quantifier $\exists^{\aleph_0} x$!
  • I confess I don't fully understand this question (I await further clarification), but in general dualization is not that complicated. If $P$ is the dual of $Q$ it just means that it acts on $\bot$ the same way that $Q$ acts on $\top$, and vice versa. So whenever you have $P$ (say, a quantifier), it's easy to find its dual: just define $Q(x_1,x_2,…) := ¬P(¬x_1,¬x_2,…)$.
  • E.g. let's say we want to find the dual of "there exist countably many $x$ such that…" ($\exists^{\aleph_0} x…$). The dual would be $¬\exists^{\aleph_0}x ¬…$ "there do not exist countably many $x$ such that not…". This expression expands easily to "for all $x$ (except perhaps either a finite or uncountable number of different $x$), …". Thus we have found the dual of the quantifier $\exists^{\aleph_0} x$!
  • I hope this clarifies the particular applications under consideration in the OP.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar clemens‭ · 2026-05-22T11:51:08Z (4 months ago)
I confess I don't fully understand this question (I await clarification), but in general dualization is not that complicated. If $P$ is the dual of $Q$ it just means that it acts on $\bot$ the same way that $Q$ acts on $\top$, and vice versa. So whenever you have $P$ (say, a quantifier), it's easy to find its dual: just define $Q(x_1,x_2,…) := ¬P(¬x_1,¬x_2,…)$. 

E.g. let's say we want to find the dual of "there exist countably many $x$ such that…" ($\exists^{\aleph_0} x…$). The dual would be $¬\exists^{\aleph_0}x ¬…$ "there do not exist countably many $x$ such that not…". This expression expands easily to "for all $x$ (except perhaps either a finite or uncountable number of different $x$), …". Thus we have found the dual of the quantifier $\exists^{\aleph_0} x$!