Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#2: Post edited by user avatar clemens‭ · 2026-05-08T03:54:26Z (4 months ago)
Added on the reason behind this distinction
  • The reason is clear enough from what you stated. $-\epsilon < 0 < \epsilon$, so the ordering properties pick out which one is which. And so when one is defining left and right derivatives, one defines them with reference to the ordering properties of $\mathbb{R}$, and so one is able to distinguish between $\epsilon$ and $-\epsilon$.
  • Note that in contexts where left and right derivatives are not distinguished (e.g. in smooth infinitesimal analysis), one does not have this ability to "pick out" $\epsilon$ to uniquely distinguish it from $-\epsilon$.
  • The reason is clear enough from what you stated. $-\epsilon < 0 < \epsilon$, so the ordering properties pick out which one is which. And so when one is defining left and right derivatives, one defines them with reference to the ordering properties of $\mathbb{R}$, and so one is able to distinguish between $\epsilon$ and $-\epsilon$.
  • Note that in contexts where left and right derivatives are not distinguished (e.g. in smooth infinitesimal analysis), one does not have this ability to "pick out" $\epsilon$ to uniquely distinguish it from $-\epsilon$.
  • Basically, there are symmetries in the underlying algebra, and to distinguish between a number (like $\epsilon$ or $i$) and its conjugates under these symmetries (like $-\epsilon$ or $-i$) one has to more or less explicitly "break" the symmetry. One can prove that this is the case by simple metalogical reasoning, systematically replacing all occurrences of a number by occurrences of its conjugates and verifying that the axioms remain invariant under this transformation.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar clemens‭ · 2026-05-08T03:27:01Z (4 months ago)
The reason is clear enough from what you stated. $-\epsilon < 0 < \epsilon$, so the ordering properties pick out which one is which. And so when one is defining left and right derivatives, one defines them with reference to the ordering properties of $\mathbb{R}$, and so one is able to distinguish between $\epsilon$ and $-\epsilon$.

Note that in contexts where left and right derivatives are not distinguished (e.g. in smooth infinitesimal analysis), one does not have this ability to "pick out" $\epsilon$ to uniquely distinguish it from $-\epsilon$.