Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Sudden changes in reputation

+4
−0

Today I noticed that my reputation suddenly went up 110 points.

In the other website, my understanding is that fast changes in reputation associated with someone upvoting a large number of posts are automatically flagged as suspicious. Is this also true for this website? And if not, what happens when such mass-upvotes or mass-downvotes are detected? (I'd assume mass-downvotes at least would be reversed…)

Also, have only I been affected, or has someone decided to perform the "community service" of looking through everyone's answers and upvoting or downvoting them depending on quality?

(Please feel free to write me if it's against policy to give information about voting patterns publicly.)

History

0 comment threads

1 answer

+3
−0

Unfair voting is not permitted anywhere on the network. By "unfair voting", we mean anything other than voting on content for its merits. That would include serial up- or downvoting, as you're talking about here. When we see evidence of patterns like this, we'll reverse the votes and reset any associated impacts such as reputation.

That said, because abilities here are not tied to reputation, we've had very few problems with serial voting, because there's very little benefit to it.

In this case, our automated systems haven't identified any concerning patterns, and I've just manually reviewed the voting data and I don't see anything concerning either. Enjoy your extra rep!

History

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »