Post History
#2: Post edited
- They are homeomorphic. The conditions given in the question:
- - infinite genus
- - orientability
- - having 1-end
- describe exactly one 2-manifold. This is a result of the classification of non-compact surfaces.
[This paper](https://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/EMIS/journals/CMUC/pdf/cmuc1704/arredo.pdf) describes these specific cases the mucube and the Loch Ness monster as being homeomorphic.
- They are homeomorphic. The conditions given in the question:
- - infinite genus
- - orientability
- - having 1-end
- describe exactly one 2-manifold. This is a result of the classification of non-compact surfaces.
- The paper by Arredondo and Maluendas ["On the infinite Loch ness monster"](https://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/EMIS/journals/CMUC/pdf/cmuc1704/arredo.pdf) describes these specific cases the mucube and the Loch Ness monster as being homeomorphic.
#1: Initial revision
They are homeomorphic. The conditions given in the question: - infinite genus - orientability - having 1-end describe exactly one 2-manifold. This is a result of the classification of non-compact surfaces. [This paper](https://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/EMIS/journals/CMUC/pdf/cmuc1704/arredo.pdf) describes these specific cases the mucube and the Loch Ness monster as being homeomorphic.
