Post History
#3: Post edited
Why do multivariate calculus students mix up addition and multiplication, in the Multivariable Chain Rule with all partial derivatives?
- Why do students mix up addition and multiplication, in the Multivariable Chain Rule with all partial derivatives?
I have taught multivariate calculus for years. Annually, at least a student swaps + and ×. They trump up- >$\color{red}{\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial s} = (\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x} + \dfrac{\partial x}{\partial s}) [\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y} + \dfrac{\partial y}{\partial s}]}$
- instead of this definition in James Stewart, Daniel Clegg, Saleem Watson. *Calculus Early Transcendentals* (2021 9 edn). Page 987.
- data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d086/5d0867321ce13c2b437d5083330bf3e7dd9fa2a0" alt=""
- This definition refers to “Theorem 1” scanned below.
- data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4543a/4543a2dccf8eb9af7cd08c8d5d96696c1beedefb" alt=""
- #### Why ? What am I failing to teach? How can I teach this better? How can I forestall further Mix Ups?
- I have taught multivariate calculus for years. Annually, some student always swaps + and ×. They trump up
- >$\color{red}{\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial s} = (\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x} + \dfrac{\partial x}{\partial s}) [\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y} + \dfrac{\partial y}{\partial s}]}$
- instead of this definition in James Stewart, Daniel Clegg, Saleem Watson. *Calculus Early Transcendentals* (2021 9 edn). Page 987.
- data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d086/5d0867321ce13c2b437d5083330bf3e7dd9fa2a0" alt=""
- This definition refers to “Theorem 1” scanned below.
- data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4543a/4543a2dccf8eb9af7cd08c8d5d96696c1beedefb" alt=""
- #### Why ? What am I failing to teach? How can I teach this better? How can I forestall further Mix Ups?
#2: Post edited
I have taught multivariate calculus for 9 years. Annually, at least a student swaps + and ×. They trump up- >$\color{red}{\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial s} = (\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x} + \dfrac{\partial x}{\partial s}) [\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y} + \dfrac{\partial y}{\partial s}]}$
- instead of this definition in James Stewart, Daniel Clegg, Saleem Watson. *Calculus Early Transcendentals* (2021 9 edn). Page 987.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aebff/aebffc07197a8cf29b808a9ffc5dae9701bac7c4" alt=""- This definition refers to “Theorem 1” scanned below.
- data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4543a/4543a2dccf8eb9af7cd08c8d5d96696c1beedefb" alt=""
- #### Why ? What am I failing to teach? How can I teach this better? How can I forestall further Mix Ups?
- I have taught multivariate calculus for years. Annually, at least a student swaps + and ×. They trump up
- >$\color{red}{\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial s} = (\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x} + \dfrac{\partial x}{\partial s}) [\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y} + \dfrac{\partial y}{\partial s}]}$
- instead of this definition in James Stewart, Daniel Clegg, Saleem Watson. *Calculus Early Transcendentals* (2021 9 edn). Page 987.
- data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d086/5d0867321ce13c2b437d5083330bf3e7dd9fa2a0" alt=""
- This definition refers to “Theorem 1” scanned below.
- data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4543a/4543a2dccf8eb9af7cd08c8d5d96696c1beedefb" alt=""
- #### Why ? What am I failing to teach? How can I teach this better? How can I forestall further Mix Ups?
#1: Initial revision
Why do multivariate calculus students mix up addition and multiplication, in the Multivariable Chain Rule with all partial derivatives?
I have taught multivariate calculus for 9 years. Annually, at least a student swaps + and ×. They trump up >$\color{red}{\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial s} = (\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x} + \dfrac{\partial x}{\partial s}) [\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y} + \dfrac{\partial y}{\partial s}]}$ instead of this definition in James Stewart, Daniel Clegg, Saleem Watson. *Calculus Early Transcendentals* (2021 9 edn). Page 987. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aebff/aebffc07197a8cf29b808a9ffc5dae9701bac7c4" alt="" This definition refers to “Theorem 1” scanned below. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4543a/4543a2dccf8eb9af7cd08c8d5d96696c1beedefb" alt="" #### Why ? What am I failing to teach? How can I teach this better? How can I forestall further Mix Ups?