Post History
#3: Post edited
- Stewart, Clegg, Watson. *Calculus Early Transcendentals*, 2021, 9th edition. page 467. Problem 64.
- ![](https://i.imgur.com/6k9kHrx.jpeg)
When I attempted this question, I thought I miffed, because my answer lacked R and r! Even after seeing the solution, I still can’t intuit why the napkin ring’s volume is independent of R and r. Before attempting any paperwork, how can a student forefeel that the napkin ring’s volume shall be independent of R and r ?- ![](https://i.imgur.com/a02inbr.jpeg)
- Stewart, Clegg, Watson. *Calculus Early Transcendentals*, 2021, 9th edition. page 467. Problem 64.
- ![](https://i.imgur.com/6k9kHrx.jpeg)
- When I attempted this question, I thought I flubbed, because my answer lacked R and r! Even after seeing the solution, I still can’t intuit why the napkin ring’s volume is independent of R and r. Before attempting any paperwork, how can a student forefeel that the napkin ring’s volume shall be independent of R and r ?
- ![](https://i.imgur.com/a02inbr.jpeg)
#2: Post edited
How can you forebode that amount of wood in a napkin ring is the same, regardless of the size of the sphere used ?
Stewart, Clegg, Watson. *Calculus Early Transcendentals*, 2021, 9th edition. page 467. Problem 64. ![](https://i.imgur.com/6k9kHrx.jpeg) When I attempted this question, I thought I miffed, because my answer lacked R and r! Even after seeing the solution, I still can’t intuit why the napkin ring’s volume is independent of R and r. Before attempting any paperwork, how can a student forefeel that the napkin ring’s volume shall be independent of R and r ? ![](https://i.imgur.com/a02inbr.jpeg)
#1: Initial revision
How can you forebode that amount of wood in a napkin ring is the same, regardless of the size of the sphere used ?
Stewart, Clegg, Watson. *Calculus Early Transcendentals*, 2021, 9th edition. page 467. Problem 64. ![](https://i.imgur.com/6k9kHrx.jpeg) When I attempted this question, I thought I miffed, because my answer lacked R and r! Even after seeing the solution, I still can’t intuit why the napkin ring’s volume is independent of R and r. Before attempting any paperwork, how can a student forefeel that the napkin ring’s volume shall be independent of R and r ? ![](https://i.imgur.com/a02inbr.jpeg)