Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Meta
Meta
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Post History

81%
+7 −0
Meta How can we grow this community?

posted 8mo ago by xamidi‭  ·  edited 8mo ago by xamidi‭

Answer
#11: Post edited by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:27:45Z (8 months ago)
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"`, `"forum" "math" "proof theory"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Googling for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now has a top result (from Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE) that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). This illustrates how easy it can be so place certain information at the right spots. But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
  • I hope you are already making use of tools like Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools.
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"`, `"forum" "math" "proof theory"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Googling for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now has a top result (from Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE) that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). This illustrates how easy it can be to place certain information at the right spots. But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
  • I hope you are already making use of tools like Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools.
#10: Post edited by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:19:33Z (8 months ago)
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"`, `"forum" "math" "proof theory"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Googling for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now has a top result (from Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE) that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). This illustrates how easy it can be so place certain information at the right spots. But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"`, `"forum" "math" "proof theory"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Googling for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now has a top result (from Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE) that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). This illustrates how easy it can be so place certain information at the right spots. But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
  • I hope you are already making use of tools like Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools.
#9: Post edited by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:17:51Z (8 months ago)
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"`, `"forum" "math" "proof theory"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in a top result (from Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE) that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). This illustrates how easy it can be so place certain information at the right spots. But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"`, `"forum" "math" "proof theory"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Googling for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now has a top result (from Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE) that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). This illustrates how easy it can be so place certain information at the right spots. But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
#8: Post edited by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:17:06Z (8 months ago)
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"`, `"forum" "math" "proof theory"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"`, `"forum" "math" "proof theory"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in a top result (from Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE) that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). This illustrates how easy it can be so place certain information at the right spots. But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
#7: Post edited by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:14:52Z (8 months ago)
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"` ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"`, `"forum" "math" "proof theory"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
#6: Post edited by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:13:29Z (8 months ago)
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, `"q&a site" "proof theory"` ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
#5: Post edited by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:11:45Z (8 months ago)
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a" q&a`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a"`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
#4: Post edited by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:09:19Z (8 months ago)
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a" q&a`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites.
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a" q&a`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites (for higher page rankings).
#3: Post edited by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:05:55Z (8 months ago)
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on your [old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a" q&a`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites.
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on [your old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a" q&a`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites.
#2: Post edited by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:04:51Z (8 months ago)
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already said it, but that answer gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on your [old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a" q&a`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites.
  • ### You really need to step up your SEO game.
  • I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already made the same point, but it oddly gained no recognition.
  • Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.
  • Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on your [old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.
  • In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.
  • It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a" q&a`, ...
  • The list goes on and on.
  • Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar xamidi‭ · 2024-04-07T00:02:26Z (8 months ago) 
### You really need to step up your SEO game.

I'd like to elaborate this from my own perspective, after how I just found this forum. Even though @ajekb78 essentially already said it, but that answer gained no recognition.

Up until an hour ago, I had no idea this site even existed. For a few years, I tried to find an active math forum, ideally Q&E focused, that was ***not*** part of Stack Exchange. I googled a lot and found many low quality forums, usually also low activity or low level.

Today, I accidently stumbled across a remark on [Math.SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/), about a "drama around Monica" topic, and after googling it and reading a few articles (including [yours](https://cellio.medium.com/dear-stack-overflow-we-need-to-talk-13bf3f90204f) on Medium), I ended up on your [old MSE profile](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/162102/monica-cellio), where I first read about Codidact.

In disbelief that I never heard of this site, despite looking for so long, I am now writing this.

It really shouldn't be the case that when googling any of the following, Math.Codidact does not appear on the first few pages: `mathematics q&a site`, `"math forum"`, `"math forum" logic`, `"logic forum"`, `"math q&a" q&a`, ...

The list goes on and on.

Searching for `q&a alternative stackexchange mathematics` now results in an answer on Math&#46;Meta&#46;SE that mentions Codidact, but it did not a year ago (because the answer is from June 2023). But there could be done so much more. Like publishing articles with all the relevant keywords, and ensuring they are referenced a lot (i.e. found by search), and link towards your sites.