Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

66%
+2 −0
#4: Post edited by user avatar TheCodidacter, or rather ACodidacter‭ · 2024-03-20T14:20:43Z (about 2 months ago)
Geo*****G******ebra.
  • Trapezoid $ABCD$ is given such that $AB\parallel CD$ and $AD=BD$. Let $M$ be the midpoint of $AB$ and $P$ be the intersection of diagonal $AC$ with the circumcircle of $\triangle BCD$. Given that $BC=27$, $CD=25$, and $AP=10$, find $MP$.
  • Here's some visualization that I made in GeoGebra:
  • ![image](https://i.imgur.com/GvR89Dj_d.webp?maxwidth=760&fidelity=grand)
  • <details>
  • <summary>My attempts:</summary>
  • The answer key states the answer is $\frac{27}5$, which I found to be true using GeoGebra.
  • To actually solve it, I later named the trapezoid's height as $h$, extended $AB$ to intersect the circle again at $Q$, named a certain length $d$, used the [intersecting secants theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersecting_secants_theorem) with the legendary [Pythagorean theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem) that we all know, went through some _heachache-inducing algebra crunching_, and eventually got it with the help of a calculator.
  • But, I thought, there must be a way to solve this that isn't so egregiously unelegant! Right?
  • So I named some angles. $\alpha=\angle BAC=\angle ACD=\angle PBD$, $\beta=\angle ABP=\angle CAD$, $\gamma=\angle ACB=\angle PDB$, $\delta=\angle BDC=\angle BPC$, $\epsilon=\angle CBD=\angle CPD$, $\zeta=\angle MDP$.
  • But I couldn't find much similarity that would be of use. Only that $\triangle APB\sim\triangle BDP\sim\triangle ACD$, which leads to $\delta=\alpha+\beta$ and $AB=\frac25AC$.
  • Even more mysteriously, with Geogebra I was able to find that $\angle MPB=\epsilon$! How is that, and would that be meaningful information? I even tried extending $BC$ to the point $F$ such that $\triangle ABC\sim\triangle CFP$ (i.e. $AFBP$ a cyclic quadrilateral), which would require $F,M,P$ to be collinear–which I haven't yet figured out how to prove.
  • </details>
  • Is there a way to solve this problem that doesn't involve _headache-inducing algebra crunching_?
  • Trapezoid $ABCD$ is given such that $AB\parallel CD$ and $AD=BD$. Let $M$ be the midpoint of $AB$ and $P$ be the intersection of diagonal $AC$ with the circumcircle of $\triangle BCD$. Given that $BC=27$, $CD=25$, and $AP=10$, find $MP$.
  • Here's some visualization that I made in GeoGebra:
  • ![image](https://i.imgur.com/GvR89Dj_d.webp?maxwidth=760&fidelity=grand)
  • <details>
  • <summary>My attempts:</summary>
  • The answer key states the answer is $\frac{27}5$, which I found to be true using GeoGebra.
  • To actually solve it, I later named the trapezoid's height as $h$, extended $AB$ to intersect the circle again at $Q$, named a certain length $d$, used the [intersecting secants theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersecting_secants_theorem) with the legendary [Pythagorean theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem) that we all know, went through some _heachache-inducing algebra crunching_, and eventually got it with the help of a calculator.
  • But, I thought, there must be a way to solve this that isn't so egregiously unelegant! Right?
  • So I named some angles. $\alpha=\angle BAC=\angle ACD=\angle PBD$, $\beta=\angle ABP=\angle CAD$, $\gamma=\angle ACB=\angle PDB$, $\delta=\angle BDC=\angle BPC$, $\epsilon=\angle CBD=\angle CPD$, $\zeta=\angle MDP$.
  • But I couldn't find much similarity that would be of use. Only that $\triangle APB\sim\triangle BDP\sim\triangle ACD$, which leads to $\delta=\alpha+\beta$ and $AB=\frac25AC$.
  • Even more mysteriously, with GeoGebra I was able to find that $\angle MPB=\epsilon$! How is that, and would that be meaningful information? I even tried extending $BC$ to the point $F$ such that $\triangle ABC\sim\triangle CFP$ (i.e. $AFBP$ a cyclic quadrilateral), which would require $F,M,P$ to be collinear–which I haven't yet figured out how to prove.
  • </details>
  • Is there a way to solve this problem that doesn't involve _headache-inducing algebra crunching_?
#3: Post edited by user avatar TheCodidacter, or rather ACodidacter‭ · 2024-03-20T14:19:14Z (about 2 months ago)
Geo**G**ebra. The more you know.
  • Trapezoid $ABCD$ is given such that $AB\parallel CD$ and $AD=BD$. Let $M$ be the midpoint of $AB$ and $P$ be the intersection of diagonal $AC$ with the circumcircle of $\triangle BCD$. Given that $BC=27$, $CD=25$, and $AP=10$, find $MP$.
  • Here's some visualization that I made in Geogebra:
  • ![image](https://i.imgur.com/GvR89Dj_d.webp?maxwidth=760&fidelity=grand)
  • <details>
  • <summary>My attempts:</summary>
  • The answer key states the answer is $\frac{27}5$, which I found to be true using Geogebra.
  • To actually solve it, I later named the trapezoid's height as $h$, extended $AB$ to intersect the circle again at $Q$, named a certain length $d$, used the [intersecting secants theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersecting_secants_theorem) with the legendary [Pythagorean theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem) that we all know, went through some _heachache-inducing algebra crunching_, and eventually got it with the help of a calculator.
  • But, I thought, there must be a way to solve this that isn't so egregiously unelegant! Right?
  • So I named some angles. $\alpha=\angle BAC=\angle ACD=\angle PBD$, $\beta=\angle ABP=\angle CAD$, $\gamma=\angle ACB=\angle PDB$, $\delta=\angle BDC=\angle BPC$, $\epsilon=\angle CBD=\angle CPD$, $\zeta=\angle MDP$.
  • But I couldn't find much similarity that would be of use. Only that $\triangle APB\sim\triangle BDP\sim\triangle ACD$, which leads to $\delta=\alpha+\beta$ and $AB=\frac25AC$.
  • Even more mysteriously, with Geogebra I was able to find that $\angle MPB=\epsilon$! How is that, and would that be meaningful information? I even tried extending $BC$ to the point $F$ such that $\triangle ABC\sim\triangle CFP$ (i.e. $AFBP$ a cyclic quadrilateral), which would require $F,M,P$ to be collinear–which I haven't yet figured out how to prove.
  • </details>
  • Is there a way to solve this problem that doesn't involve _headache-inducing algebra crunching_?
  • Trapezoid $ABCD$ is given such that $AB\parallel CD$ and $AD=BD$. Let $M$ be the midpoint of $AB$ and $P$ be the intersection of diagonal $AC$ with the circumcircle of $\triangle BCD$. Given that $BC=27$, $CD=25$, and $AP=10$, find $MP$.
  • Here's some visualization that I made in GeoGebra:
  • ![image](https://i.imgur.com/GvR89Dj_d.webp?maxwidth=760&fidelity=grand)
  • <details>
  • <summary>My attempts:</summary>
  • The answer key states the answer is $\frac{27}5$, which I found to be true using GeoGebra.
  • To actually solve it, I later named the trapezoid's height as $h$, extended $AB$ to intersect the circle again at $Q$, named a certain length $d$, used the [intersecting secants theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersecting_secants_theorem) with the legendary [Pythagorean theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem) that we all know, went through some _heachache-inducing algebra crunching_, and eventually got it with the help of a calculator.
  • But, I thought, there must be a way to solve this that isn't so egregiously unelegant! Right?
  • So I named some angles. $\alpha=\angle BAC=\angle ACD=\angle PBD$, $\beta=\angle ABP=\angle CAD$, $\gamma=\angle ACB=\angle PDB$, $\delta=\angle BDC=\angle BPC$, $\epsilon=\angle CBD=\angle CPD$, $\zeta=\angle MDP$.
  • But I couldn't find much similarity that would be of use. Only that $\triangle APB\sim\triangle BDP\sim\triangle ACD$, which leads to $\delta=\alpha+\beta$ and $AB=\frac25AC$.
  • Even more mysteriously, with Geogebra I was able to find that $\angle MPB=\epsilon$! How is that, and would that be meaningful information? I even tried extending $BC$ to the point $F$ such that $\triangle ABC\sim\triangle CFP$ (i.e. $AFBP$ a cyclic quadrilateral), which would require $F,M,P$ to be collinear–which I haven't yet figured out how to prove.
  • </details>
  • Is there a way to solve this problem that doesn't involve _headache-inducing algebra crunching_?
#2: Post edited by user avatar TheCodidacter, or rather ACodidacter‭ · 2024-03-20T11:24:33Z (about 2 months ago)
Length
  • Find $MP$ in trapezoid
  • Find length $MP$ in trapezoid
#1: Initial revision by user avatar TheCodidacter, or rather ACodidacter‭ · 2024-03-20T11:15:58Z (about 2 months ago)
Find $MP$ in trapezoid
Trapezoid $ABCD$ is given such that $AB\parallel CD$ and $AD=BD$. Let $M$ be the midpoint of $AB$ and $P$ be the intersection of diagonal $AC$ with the circumcircle of $\triangle BCD$. Given that $BC=27$, $CD=25$, and $AP=10$, find $MP$.

Here's some visualization that I made in Geogebra:
![image](https://i.imgur.com/GvR89Dj_d.webp?maxwidth=760&fidelity=grand)

<details>
<summary>My attempts:</summary>
The answer key states the answer is $\frac{27}5$, which I found to be true using Geogebra.

To actually solve it, I later named the trapezoid's height as $h$, extended $AB$ to intersect the circle again at $Q$, named a certain length $d$, used the [intersecting secants theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersecting_secants_theorem) with the legendary [Pythagorean theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem) that we all know, went through some _heachache-inducing algebra crunching_, and eventually got it with the help of a calculator.

But, I thought, there must be a way to solve this that isn't so egregiously unelegant! Right?

So I named some angles. $\alpha=\angle BAC=\angle ACD=\angle PBD$, $\beta=\angle ABP=\angle CAD$, $\gamma=\angle ACB=\angle PDB$, $\delta=\angle BDC=\angle BPC$, $\epsilon=\angle CBD=\angle CPD$, $\zeta=\angle MDP$.

But I couldn't find much similarity that would be of use. Only that $\triangle APB\sim\triangle BDP\sim\triangle ACD$, which leads to $\delta=\alpha+\beta$ and $AB=\frac25AC$.

Even more mysteriously, with Geogebra I was able to find that $\angle MPB=\epsilon$! How is that, and would that be meaningful information? I even tried extending $BC$ to the point $F$ such that $\triangle ABC\sim\triangle CFP$ (i.e. $AFBP$ a cyclic quadrilateral), which would require $F,M,P$ to be collinear–which I haven't yet figured out how to prove.
</details>

Is there a way to solve this problem that doesn't involve _headache-inducing algebra crunching_?