Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#1: Initial revision by user avatar Julius H.‭ · 2024-02-10T15:35:55Z (11 months ago)
What are the “increasingly stable consequences of the large cardinal hierarchy”?
I would like to understand the following quote, from a [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.4223) by Joel Hamkins:


 > Adherents of the universe view often point to the increasingly stable consequences of the large cardinal hierarchy, particularly in the realm of projective sets of reals with its attractive determinacy and regularity features, as well as the forcing-absoluteness properties for L(R), as evidence that we are on the right track towards the final answers to these set theoretical questions.

1. What is the large cardinal hierarchy?
2. What are its stable consequences?
3. What are projective sets?
4. What are determinacy and regularity features?
5. What is L(R)?