Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#2: Post edited by user avatar mr Tsjolder‭ · 2023-09-19T15:20:14Z (about 1 year ago)
  • Is it possible to show that a normalised variable has zero mean and unit variance?
  • Is it possible to show that a normalised random variable has zero mean and unit variance?
#1: Initial revision by user avatar mr Tsjolder‭ · 2023-09-19T15:19:37Z (about 1 year ago)
Is it possible to show that a normalised variable has zero mean and unit variance?
Given some random variable $X_i$, is it possible to compute expectations of the normalised value, like: $$\mathbb{E}\biggl[\frac{X_i - \bar{x}}{s}\biggr],$$
where $\bar{x} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{j=1}^N X_j$ is the sample mean and $s^2 = \frac{1}{N - 1} \sum_{j=1}^N (X_j - \bar{x})^2$ is the sample variance?

Obviously, I could treat $\bar{x}$ and $s$ as constants and use linearity in expectation to arrive at a simple, but not very interesting solution.
However, I would be more interested in the case where $\bar{x}$ and $s$ are also treated as random variables.
After all, if we assume $\forall j : \mathbb{E}[X_j] = \mu$ and $\mathbb{E}[X_j^2] = \sigma^2 + \mu^2$, we should have $\mathbb{E}[\bar{x}] = \mu$ and $\mathbb{E}[s^2] = \sigma^2$.
As a result, it seems reasonable to expect that $\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\frac{X_i - \bar{x}}{s}\Bigr] = 0$ and $\mathbb{E}\biggl[\Big(\frac{X_i - \bar{x}}{s}\Big)^2\biggr] = 1$.
However, I am not quite sure how this could be proven.

When considering only the centring of the random variable, I managed to get the following result:
$$\begin{align}
  \mathbb{E}[X_i - \bar{x}] &= \mathbb{E}\Bigl[X_i - \frac{1}{N}\sum_j X_j\Bigr] \\\\
  &= \frac{N - 1}{N} \mathbb{E}\Bigl[X_i\Bigr] - \frac{1}{N} \mathbb{E}\sum_{j \neq i} \Bigl[X_j\Bigr] \\\\
  &= \frac{N - 1}{N} \mu - \frac{N - 1}{N} \mu = 0.
\end{align}$$
Note that I explicitly took a little detour to emphasise the dependence between $X_i$ and $\bar{x}$.
Is it possible to make a similar kind of derivation for the normalised variable?

Is there any way to proof that this normalised variable actually has zero mean and unit variance, despite the dependencies? 
Or is my assumption that the normalised random variable has zero mean and unit variance simply incorrect?