Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#2: Post edited by user avatar Peter Taylor‭ · 2023-01-25T15:20:17Z (about 1 year ago)
Tweak for consistency
  • Let $\tau(n)$ denote the number of divisors of $n$. OEIS sequence [A309981](https://oeis.org/A309981) gives the smallest $k$ such that the tuple $(\tau(n), \tau(n+1), \ldots, \tau(n+k))$ uniquely determines $n$.
  • For small $n$ the value can often be verified by case analysis in residues to a suitable modulus, but $n=49$ is more resistent (and the notes in the OEIS history show that the person who posted the sequence considered it more challenging). No reference is given, and the correctness of $a(49) = 2$ is in the examples essentially as a bare assertion.
  • > How can it be shown that $\tau(n) = 3$, $\tau(n+1) = 6$ and $\tau(n+2) = 4$ has a unique solution?
  • ---
  • For comparison, and in case it's helpful, I give the standard case analysis.
  • $n$ must be a prime square $p_0^2$; it's not $2^2$ because $\tau(2^2 + 1) = 2 \neq 6$, so $n$ is odd. It's not $3^2$ because $\tau(3^2 + 1) = 4 \neq 6$. Therefore $p_0$ is coprime to $6$ and $n \equiv 1 \pmod 6$. Note also that since it's an odd square, $n \equiv 1 \pmod 8$. Combining the two, $n \equiv 1 \pmod {24}$.
  • $n+1$ is either $p_1^5$ or $p_1^2 q_1$. It's even; it's not $32$ because $\tau(31) = 2 \neq 3$, so it's either $4 q_1$ or $2 p_1^2$. But $4 q_1 \not \equiv 2 \pmod {24}$ so $n+1 = 2p_1^2$.
  • $n+2$ is either a prime cube $p_2^3$ or a semiprime $p_2 q_2$. Since $n+2 \equiv 3 \pmod {24}$ it's divisible by $3$; if it's a prime cube then it's $3^3$, but $\tau(3^3 - 1) = 4
  • eq 6$, so $n+2 = 3 q_2$.
  • In summary \begin{array}{ccccc}n &=& p_0^2 &\equiv& 1 \pmod {24} \\\\
  • n + 1 &=& 2p_1^2 \\\\
  • n + 2 &=& 3p_3
  • \end{array}
  • Let $\tau(n)$ denote the number of divisors of $n$. OEIS sequence [A309981](https://oeis.org/A309981) gives the smallest $k$ such that the tuple $(\tau(n), \tau(n+1), \ldots, \tau(n+k))$ uniquely determines $n$.
  • For small $n$ the value can often be verified by case analysis in residues to a suitable modulus, but $n=49$ is more resistent (and the notes in the OEIS history show that the person who posted the sequence considered it more challenging). No reference is given, and the correctness of $a(49) = 2$ is in the examples essentially as a bare assertion.
  • > How can it be shown that $\tau(n) = 3$, $\tau(n+1) = 6$ and $\tau(n+2) = 4$ has a unique solution?
  • ---
  • For comparison, and in case it's helpful, I give the standard case analysis.
  • $n$ must be a prime square $p_0^2$; it's not $2^2$ because $\tau(2^2 + 1) = 2 \neq 6$, so $n$ is odd. It's not $3^2$ because $\tau(3^2 + 1) = 4 \neq 6$. Therefore $p_0$ is coprime to $6$ and $n \equiv 1 \pmod 6$. Note also that since it's an odd square, $n \equiv 1 \pmod 8$. Combining the two, $n \equiv 1 \pmod {24}$.
  • $n+1$ is either $p_1^5$ or $p_1^2 q_1$. It's even; it's not $32$ because $\tau(31) = 2 \neq 3$, so it's either $4 q_1$ or $2 p_1^2$. But $4 q_1 \not \equiv 2 \pmod {24}$ so $n+1 = 2p_1^2$.
  • $n+2$ is either a prime cube $p_2^3$ or a semiprime $p_2 q_2$. Since $n+2 \equiv 3 \pmod {24}$ it's divisible by $3$; if it's a prime cube then it's $3^3$, but $\tau(3^3 - 1) = 4
  • eq 6$, so $n+2 = 3 p_2$.
  • In summary \begin{array}{ccccc}n &=& p_0^2 &\equiv& 1 \pmod {24} \\\\
  • n + 1 &=& 2p_1^2 \\\\
  • n + 2 &=& 3p_3
  • \end{array}
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Peter Taylor‭ · 2023-01-25T15:19:06Z (about 1 year ago)
Prove that 49 is the only prime square to be followed by twice a prime square and then a semiprime
Let $\tau(n)$ denote the number of divisors of $n$. OEIS sequence [A309981](https://oeis.org/A309981) gives the smallest $k$ such that the tuple $(\tau(n), \tau(n+1), \ldots, \tau(n+k))$ uniquely determines $n$.

For small $n$ the value can often be verified by case analysis in residues to a suitable modulus, but $n=49$ is more resistent (and the notes in the OEIS history show that the person who posted the sequence considered it more challenging). No reference is given, and the correctness of $a(49) = 2$ is in the examples essentially as a bare assertion.

> How can it be shown that $\tau(n) = 3$, $\tau(n+1) = 6$ and $\tau(n+2) = 4$ has a unique solution?

---

For comparison, and in case it's helpful, I give the standard case analysis.

$n$ must be a prime square $p_0^2$; it's not $2^2$ because $\tau(2^2 + 1) = 2 \neq 6$, so $n$ is odd. It's not $3^2$ because $\tau(3^2 + 1) = 4 \neq 6$. Therefore $p_0$ is coprime to $6$ and $n \equiv 1 \pmod 6$. Note also that since it's an odd square, $n \equiv 1 \pmod 8$. Combining the two, $n \equiv 1 \pmod {24}$.

$n+1$ is either $p_1^5$ or $p_1^2 q_1$. It's even; it's not $32$ because $\tau(31) = 2 \neq 3$, so it's either $4 q_1$ or $2 p_1^2$. But $4 q_1 \not \equiv 2 \pmod {24}$ so $n+1 = 2p_1^2$.

$n+2$ is either a prime cube $p_2^3$ or a semiprime $p_2 q_2$. Since $n+2 \equiv 3 \pmod {24}$ it's divisible by $3$; if it's a prime cube then it's $3^3$, but $\tau(3^3 - 1) = 4 \neq 6$, so $n+2 = 3 q_2$.

In summary \begin{array}{ccccc}n &=& p_0^2 &\equiv& 1 \pmod {24} \\\\
n + 1 &=& 2p_1^2 \\\\
n + 2 &=& 3p_3
\end{array}