> Can we agree on how much, **if any**, the meta reputation should account as part of the overall math reputation?
It seems that currently the math.meta reputation counts equally to the math reputation. I feel like this spoils the quality of the math reputation. I understand that participating in the math.meta is important for the development of the site, but I find the reputation from the two completely inconsistent, it is like adding two quantities that are measured in completely different units. Perhaps many of you will now disagree and down-vote this post, so my reputation will go down to the negative figures. It won't (on its own) imply that I was a bad mathematician, instead it would only imply that I was a badly opinionated mathematician.
For context: https://math.codidact.com/comments/thread/7152#comment-19164
Pavel Kocourek
·
2023-01-23T18:37:17Z (almost 2 years ago)