Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Are vectrices useful for calculations as opposed to formalism?

1 answer  ·  posted 2y ago by Fred Wamsley‭  ·  last activity 2y ago by Derek Elkins‭

Question Vectrix Numerical
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Fred Wamsley‭ · 2022-05-17T01:22:34Z (over 2 years ago)
Are vectrices useful for calculations as opposed to formalism?
The context here is calculations about satellite attitude control and motion. There is a frequent need to convert between reference frames, and a vectrix is a clever notation to assist. 

The fundamental idea is to represent a frame of reference by a 3x1 matrix in which the elements are not scalars but instead the basis vectors of the frame's coordinate system. That structure, a "vectrix", can be multiplied by [x y z] coordinates resulting in a vector. The idea is developed a bit more at https://vatankhahghadim.github.io/AER506/Notes/1%20-%20Fundamentals.pdf

It makes for an elegant notation, definitely. The question is whether they serve well when you're having a computer crunch numbers, as opposed to when you're deriving equations.