Post History
#3: Post edited
- ## My questions
- 1. Can you cite or scan the question from the source? I am leery, because the claim appears false.
- 2. Is g(x) supposed to be convex?
- ## Game plan
- I shall construct, on top of
, a function which occasionally jumps up a constant amount over littler and littler intervals. This means I can create a function with the growth rate of , but with as much derivative growth as I want. - ## Counter Example
- Let
be any nonnegative continuous function with the property that and everywhere, and $h = 0 [-0.25,0.25] H(x)= h(x) + 2h(2(x-1)) + 4h(4(x-2)) + 8h((x-3)/8) + ...$- Then
converges to a continuous function, because the supports of each summand are disjoint. Observe that . - Let
. Then certainly is , increasing, and tends to infinity. I constructed , and $0$ outside a finite interval. Thus for some constant C. Then , since at most of the rescaled $h'seq 0$.- So
grows at most polynomially. But we just constructed so that has an exponentially growing SUBsequence!
- ## My questions
- 1. Can you cite or scan the question from the source? I am leery, because the claim appears false.
- 2. Is g(x) supposed to be convex?
- ## Game plan
- I shall construct, on top of
, a function which occasionally jumps up a constant amount over littler and littler intervals. This means I can create a function with the growth rate of , but with as much derivative growth as I want. - ## Counter Example
- Let
be any nonnegative continuous function with the property that and everywhere, and $h = 0 - $ outside the finite interval
. Let - Then
converges to a continuous function, because the supports of each summand are disjoint. Observe that . - Let
. Then certainly is , increasing, and tends to infinity. - I constructed
, and $h = 0$. Thus for some constant C. Then , since at most of the rescaled $h's - eq 0$.
- So
grows at most polynomially. But we just constructed so that has an exponentially growing SUBsequence!
#2: Post edited
- ## My questions
Can you scan the question as you were assigned? I am leery, because the claim appears false.Is g(x) supposed to be convex?- ## Game plan
- I shall construct, on top of
, a function which occasionally jumps up a constant amount over littler and littler intervals. This means I can create a function with the growth rate of , but with as much derivative growth as I want. - ## Counter Example
- Let
be any nonnegative continuous function with the property that and everywhere, and $h = 0 [-0.25,0.25] H(x)= h(x) + 2h(2(x-1)) + 4h(4(x-2)) + 8h((x-3)/8) + ...$- Then
converges to a continuous function, because the supports of each summand are disjoint. Observe that . - Let
. Then certainly is , increasing, and tends to infinity. - I constructed
, and outside a finite interval. Thus for some constant C. Then , since at most of the rescaled . - So
grows at most polynomially. But we just constructed so that has an exponentially growing SUBsequence!
- ## My questions
- 1. Can you cite or scan the question from the source? I am leery, because the claim appears false.
- 2. Is g(x) supposed to be convex?
- ## Game plan
- I shall construct, on top of
, a function which occasionally jumps up a constant amount over littler and littler intervals. This means I can create a function with the growth rate of , but with as much derivative growth as I want. - ## Counter Example
- Let
be any nonnegative continuous function with the property that and everywhere, and $h = 0 [-0.25,0.25] H(x)= h(x) + 2h(2(x-1)) + 4h(4(x-2)) + 8h((x-3)/8) + ...$- Then
converges to a continuous function, because the supports of each summand are disjoint. Observe that . - Let
. Then certainly is , increasing, and tends to infinity. - I constructed
, and outside a finite interval. Thus for some constant C. Then , since at most of the rescaled . - So
grows at most polynomially. But we just constructed so that has an exponentially growing SUBsequence!
#1: Initial revision
## My questions Can you scan the question as you were assigned? I am leery, because the claim appears false. Is g(x) supposed to be convex? ## Game plan I shall construct, on top of $f(x)=x$, a function which occasionally jumps up a constant amount over littler and littler intervals. This means I can create a function with the growth rate of $x$, but with as much derivative growth as I want. ## Counter Example Let $h(x)$ be any nonnegative continuous function with the property that $h(0) = 1$ and $h \le 1$ everywhere, and $h = 0 $ outside the interval $[-0.25,0.25]$. Let $H(x)= h(x) + 2h(2(x-1)) + 4h(4(x-2)) + 8h((x-3)/8) + ...$ Then $H(x)$ converges to a continuous function, because the supports of each summand are disjoint. Observe that $H(n) = 2n$. Let $g(x) = x + \int^0_x H(t) \, dt$. Then certainly $g$ is $C^1$, increasing, and tends to infinity. I constructed $h \le 1$, and $0$ outside a finite interval. Thus $ \int^0_x ah(at) = \int^0_{x/a} h(u) du \le C$ for some constant C. Then $g(x) \le x + C(x+1)$, since at most $x+1$ of the rescaled $h's \neq 0$. So $g^{1+\epsilon}$ grows at most polynomially. But we just constructed $g$ so that $g' \ge H$ has an exponentially growing SUBsequence!