Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#7: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-25T17:54:07Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • How can a 16 year old construe the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity, when it lacks summation limits and a summation index?
  • How can a 15 year old construe the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity, when it lacks summation limits and a summation index?
  • Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/3572304) (henceforth RHI)
  • $\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$
  • generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1131450) (henceforth GVI),
  • $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$
  • RHI is more intelligible than GVI for my 16 year old. A 16 y.o. can effortlessly write any term of RHI, by substituting the lower limits for all $k$ in the addend. When $k = 0$, just input $k = 0$ in the addend. When $k = n$, just swap all $k$'s in the addend with $n$'s!
  • But how can a 16 y.o. interpret the LHS of GVI? Or even write the first few terms of the LHS of GVI? It contains no lower and upper limits of summation, and no summation index. GVI contains no $k$, unlike RHI!
  • Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/3572304) (henceforth RHI)
  • $\sum\limits_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$
  • generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1131450) (henceforth GVI),
  • $\sum\limits_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$
  • RHI is more intelligible than GVI for my 15 year old. A 15 y.o. can effortlessly write any term of RHI, by substituting the lower limits for all $k$ in the addend. When $k = 0$, just input $k = 0$ in the addend. When $k = n$, just swap all $k$'s in the addend with $n$'s!
  • But how can a 15 y.o. interpret the LHS of GVI? Or even write the first few terms of the LHS of GVI? It contains no lower and upper limits of summation, and no summation index. GVI contains no $k$, unlike RHI!
#6: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-25T17:51:57Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothe%E2%80%93Hagen_identity)
  • $\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$
  • generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1131450),
  • $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$
  • the former is more intelligible than the latter for a 16 year old. A 16 y.o. can effortlessly write any particular term of Rothe-Hagen Identity, by substituting the lower limits for all k in the addend. When $k = 0$, just input $k = 0$ in the addend. When $k = n$, just swap all $k$'s in the addend with $n$'s!
  • But how can a 16 y.o. interpret the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? How can a 16 y.o. even write the first few terms of the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? It contains no lower limit of summation, no upper limit of summation, and no summation index (no k, unlike Rothe-Hagen Identity)!
  • Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/3572304) (henceforth RHI)
  • $\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$
  • generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1131450) (henceforth GVI),
  • $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$
  • RHI is more intelligible than GVI for my 16 year old. A 16 y.o. can effortlessly write any term of RHI, by substituting the lower limits for all $k$ in the addend. When $k = 0$, just input $k = 0$ in the addend. When $k = n$, just swap all $k$'s in the addend with $n$'s!
  • But how can a 16 y.o. interpret the LHS of GVI? Or even write the first few terms of the LHS of GVI? It contains no lower and upper limits of summation, and no summation index. GVI contains no $k$, unlike RHI!
#5: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-25T17:32:58Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothe%E2%80%93Hagen_identity)
  • $\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$
  • generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandermonde%27s_identity#Generalized_Vandermonde's_identity),
  • $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$
  • the former is more intelligible than the latter for a 16 year old. A 16 y.o. can effortlessly write any particular term of Rothe-Hagen Identity, by substituting the lower limits for all k in the addend. When $k = 0$, just input $k = 0$ in the addend. When $k = n$, just swap all $k$'s in the addend with $n$'s!
  • But how can a 16 y.o. interpret the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? How can a 16 y.o. even write the first few terms of the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? It contains no lower limit of summation, no upper limit of summation, and no summation index (no k, unlike Rothe-Hagen Identity)!
  • Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothe%E2%80%93Hagen_identity)
  • $\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$
  • generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1131450),
  • $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$
  • the former is more intelligible than the latter for a 16 year old. A 16 y.o. can effortlessly write any particular term of Rothe-Hagen Identity, by substituting the lower limits for all k in the addend. When $k = 0$, just input $k = 0$ in the addend. When $k = n$, just swap all $k$'s in the addend with $n$'s!
  • But how can a 16 y.o. interpret the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? How can a 16 y.o. even write the first few terms of the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? It contains no lower limit of summation, no upper limit of summation, and no summation index (no k, unlike Rothe-Hagen Identity)!
#4: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-25T17:13:08Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothe%E2%80%93Hagen_identity)
  • $\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$
  • generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandermonde%27s_identity#Generalized_Vandermonde's_identity),
  • $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$
  • the former is more intelligible than the latter for a 16 year old. A 16 y.o. can effortlessly write any particular term of Rothe-Hagen Identity, by substituting the lower limits for all k in the addend. When $k = 0$, just input $k = 0$ in the addend. When $k = n$, just swap all $k$'s in the addend with $n$'s!
  • But how can a 16 y.o. interpret the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? How can a 16 y.o. even write t the first few terms of the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? It contains no lower limit of summation, no upper limit of summation, and no summation index!
  • Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothe%E2%80%93Hagen_identity)
  • $\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$
  • generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandermonde%27s_identity#Generalized_Vandermonde's_identity),
  • $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$
  • the former is more intelligible than the latter for a 16 year old. A 16 y.o. can effortlessly write any particular term of Rothe-Hagen Identity, by substituting the lower limits for all k in the addend. When $k = 0$, just input $k = 0$ in the addend. When $k = n$, just swap all $k$'s in the addend with $n$'s!
  • But how can a 16 y.o. interpret the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? How can a 16 y.o. even write the first few terms of the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? It contains no lower limit of summation, no upper limit of summation, and no summation index (no k, unlike Rothe-Hagen Identity)!
#3: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-25T06:10:31Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • How can a 16 year old construe $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$?
  • How can a 16 year old construe the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity, when it lacks summation limits and a summation index?
#2: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-25T06:09:55Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothe%E2%80%93Hagen_identity)
  • $\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$
  • generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandermonde%27s_identity#Generalized_Vandermonde's_identity),
  • $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$
  • the former is more intelligible than the latter for a 16 year old. A 16 y.o. can effortlessly write the terms of Rothe-Hagen Identity, by substituting the lower limits into the addend.
  • But how would you write the first few terms of the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? It contains no lower limit of summation, no upper limit of summation, and no summation index!
  • Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothe%E2%80%93Hagen_identity)
  • $\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$
  • generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandermonde%27s_identity#Generalized_Vandermonde's_identity),
  • $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$
  • the former is more intelligible than the latter for a 16 year old. A 16 y.o. can effortlessly write any particular term of Rothe-Hagen Identity, by substituting the lower limits for all k in the addend. When $k = 0$, just input $k = 0$ in the addend. When $k = n$, just swap all $k$'s in the addend with $n$'s!
  • But how can a 16 y.o. interpret the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? How can a 16 y.o. even write t the first few terms of the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? It contains no lower limit of summation, no upper limit of summation, and no summation index!
#1: Initial revision by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-25T06:07:44Z (almost 3 years ago)
How can a 16 year old construe $\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$?
Paradoxically, though [Rothe-Hagen Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothe%E2%80%93Hagen_identity)

$\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x}{x+kz}{x+kz \choose k}\frac{y}{y+(n-k)z}{y+(n-k)z \choose n-k}=\frac{x+y}{x+y+nz}{x+y+nz \choose n}$

 generalizes [Generalized Vandermonde's Identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandermonde%27s_identity#Generalized_Vandermonde's_identity), 

$\sum_{k_1+\cdots +k_p = m} {n_1\choose k_1} {n_2\choose k_2} \cdots {n_p\choose k_p} = { n_1+\dots +n_p \choose m }$


the former is more intelligible than the latter for a 16 year old. A 16 y.o. can effortlessly write the terms of Rothe-Hagen Identity, by substituting the lower limits into the addend. 

But how would you write the first few terms of the LHS of Generalized Vandermonde's Identity? It contains no lower limit of summation, no upper limit of summation, and no summation index!