Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#10: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-02-01T10:24:37Z (about 2 years ago)
  • How to intuit, construe multiplicands and multiplicators $\le 10$ resulting from $\dbinom m n$ directly, WITHOUT division or factorials?
  • How to intuit, construe multiplicands and multiplicators $\le 10$ resulting from $\dbinom pc$, WITHOUT division or factorials?
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather — how can I deduce and intuit the multiplicands and multiplicators $\le 10$, resulting from simplifying $\dbinom m n$ DIRECTLY? WITHOUT division or factorials!**
  • ## Orange underline
  • 1. Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2 = 3!}$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ wasn't one of the original numbers (2, 4) — what does $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write 3! explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Did I surmise correctly?
  • ## Red underline
  • 2. Unquestionably, $\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!} = 8 × 7}$. But how can I construe and intuit $\color{red}{8 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{red}{7 } $ wasn't one of the original numbers of 3 or 8. What does $\color{red}{7 } $ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (David Patrick, p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • >
  • >![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • ## Examples 3 and 4
  • 3. I know [the ways to form a committee of 2 from 8](https://mathhelpforum.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.295777/post-975751) $= \dbinom8 2 = \dfrac{8\cdot7}{2!} = \color{violet}{4 × 7}.$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{violet}{4 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{violet}{4, 7}$ aren't the original numbers of 2, 8.
  • 4. I know [the ways to form a committee of 3 from 10](https://mathforums.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.362347/post-664313) $= \dbinom {10} 3 = \dfrac{10\cdot9\cdot8}{3!} = \color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}.$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}$ DIRECTLY? I'm surmising that $\color{springgreen}{10}$ refers to the original 10, and $\color{springgreen}{3}$ to the chosen 3. But what does $\color{springgreen}{4}$ mean?
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. Rather — **how can I deduce and intuit the multiplicands and multiplicators $\le 10$, resulting from simplifying $\dbinom {p \text{ people}}{c\text{-person committee}}$ DIRECTLY?** ***WITHOUT division or factorials!***
  • ## Orange underline
  • 1. Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2 = 3!}$. But how can I construe, intuit $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ wasn't one of the original numbers (2, 4). What does $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write 3! explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Did I surmise correctly?
  • ## Red underline
  • 2. Unquestionably, $\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!} = 8 × 7}$. But how can I construe, intuit $\color{red}{8 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{red}{7 } $ wasn't one of the original numbers of 3 or 8. What does $\color{red}{7 } $ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in $\color{red}{8} $ ways, and the 2nd member in $\color{red}{7} $ ways. Then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (David Patrick, p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6? Why didn't 6 appear as a multiplicator?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • >
  • >![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* 2005, pp 66-7.
  • ## Examples 3 and 4
  • 3. I know [the ways to form a committee of 2 from 8](https://mathhelpforum.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.295777/post-975751) $= \dbinom8 2 = \dfrac{8\cdot7}{2!} = \color{violet}{4 × 7}.$ But how can I construe, intuit $\color{violet}{4 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{violet}{4, 7}$ aren't the original numbers of 2, 8.
  • 4. I know [the ways to form a committee of 3 from 10](https://mathforums.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.362347/post-664313) $= \dbinom {10} 3 = \dfrac{10\cdot9\cdot8}{3!} = \color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}.$ But how can I construe, intuit $\color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}$ DIRECTLY? I'm surmising that $\color{springgreen}{10}$ refers to the original 10, and $\color{springgreen}{3}$ to the chosen 3. But what does $\color{springgreen}{4}$ mean?
#9: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-02-01T09:30:50Z (about 2 years ago)
  • How to intuit, construe ways to form a m-member committee from p people directly, WITHOUT division or factorials?
  • How to intuit, construe multiplicands and multiplicators $\le 10$ resulting from $\dbinom m n$ directly, WITHOUT division or factorials?
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather, how can I deduce and intuit the final answer DIRECTLY, WITHOUT division or factorials?**
  • ## Orange underline
  • 1. Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2 = 3!}$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ wasn't one of the original numbers (2, 4) — what does $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write 3! explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Did I surmise correctly?
  • ## Red underline
  • 2. Unquestionably, $\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!} = 8 × 7}$. But how can I construe and intuit $\color{red}{8 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{red}{7 } $ wasn't one of the original numbers of 3 or 8. What does $\color{red}{7 } $ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (David Patrick, p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • >
  • >![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • ## Examples 3 and 4
  • 3. I know [the ways to form a committee of 2 from 8](https://mathhelpforum.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.295777/post-975751) $= \dbinom8 2 = \dfrac{8\cdot7}{2!} = \color{violet}{4 × 7}.$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{violet}{4 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{violet}{4, 7}$ aren't the original numbers of 2, 8.
  • 4. I know [the ways to form a committee of 3 from 10](https://mathforums.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.362347/post-664313) $= \dbinom {10} 3 = \dfrac{10\cdot9\cdot8}{3!} = \color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}.$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}$ DIRECTLY? I'm surmising that $\color{springgreen}{10}$ refers to the original 10, and $\color{springgreen}{3}$ to the chosen 3. But what does $\color{springgreen}{4}$ mean?
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather how can I deduce and intuit the multiplicands and multiplicators $\le 10$, resulting from simplifying $\dbinom m n$ DIRECTLY? WITHOUT division or factorials!**
  • ## Orange underline
  • 1. Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2 = 3!}$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ wasn't one of the original numbers (2, 4) — what does $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write 3! explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Did I surmise correctly?
  • ## Red underline
  • 2. Unquestionably, $\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!} = 8 × 7}$. But how can I construe and intuit $\color{red}{8 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{red}{7 } $ wasn't one of the original numbers of 3 or 8. What does $\color{red}{7 } $ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (David Patrick, p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • >
  • >![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • ## Examples 3 and 4
  • 3. I know [the ways to form a committee of 2 from 8](https://mathhelpforum.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.295777/post-975751) $= \dbinom8 2 = \dfrac{8\cdot7}{2!} = \color{violet}{4 × 7}.$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{violet}{4 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{violet}{4, 7}$ aren't the original numbers of 2, 8.
  • 4. I know [the ways to form a committee of 3 from 10](https://mathforums.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.362347/post-664313) $= \dbinom {10} 3 = \dfrac{10\cdot9\cdot8}{3!} = \color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}.$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}$ DIRECTLY? I'm surmising that $\color{springgreen}{10}$ refers to the original 10, and $\color{springgreen}{3}$ to the chosen 3. But what does $\color{springgreen}{4}$ mean?
#8: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-02-01T09:24:45Z (about 2 years ago)
  • How to intuit, construe ways to form a m-member committee from p people directly WITHOUT division or factorials?
  • How to intuit, construe ways to form a m-member committee from p people directly, WITHOUT division or factorials?
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather, how can I deduce and intuit the final answer DIRECTLY, WITHOUT division or factorials?**
  • ## Orange underline
  • 1. Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2 = 3!}$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ wasn't one of the original numbers (2, 4) — what does $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write 3! explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Did I surmise correctly?
  • ## Red underline
  • 2. Unquestionably, $\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!} = 8 × 7}$. But how can I construe and intuit $\color{red}{8 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{red}{7 } $ wasn't one of the original numbers of 3 or 8. What does $\color{red}{7 } $ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (David Patrick, p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • >
  • >![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • ## Examples 3 and 4
  • 3. I know [the ways to form a committee of 2 from 8](https://mathhelpforum.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.295777/post-975751) $= \dbinom8 2 = \dfrac{8\cdot7}{2!} = \color{violet}{4 × 7}.$ But again, how can I construe and intuit $\color{violet}{4 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{violet}{4, 7}$ aren't the original numbers of 2, 8.
  • [4. I know [the ways to form a committee of 3 from 10](https://mathforums.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.362347/post-664313) $= \dbinom {10} 3 = \dfrac{10\cdot9\cdot8}{3!} = \color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}.$ But again, how can I construe and intuit $\color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}$ DIRECTLY? I'm surmising that $\color{springgreen}{10}$ refers to the original 10, and $\color{springgreen}{3}$ to the chosen 3. But what does $\color{springgreen}{4}$ mean?
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather, how can I deduce and intuit the final answer DIRECTLY, WITHOUT division or factorials?**
  • ## Orange underline
  • 1. Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2 = 3!}$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ wasn't one of the original numbers (2, 4) — what does $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write 3! explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Did I surmise correctly?
  • ## Red underline
  • 2. Unquestionably, $\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!} = 8 × 7}$. But how can I construe and intuit $\color{red}{8 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{red}{7 } $ wasn't one of the original numbers of 3 or 8. What does $\color{red}{7 } $ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (David Patrick, p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • >
  • >![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • ## Examples 3 and 4
  • 3. I know [the ways to form a committee of 2 from 8](https://mathhelpforum.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.295777/post-975751) $= \dbinom8 2 = \dfrac{8\cdot7}{2!} = \color{violet}{4 × 7}.$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{violet}{4 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{violet}{4, 7}$ aren't the original numbers of 2, 8.
  • 4. I know [the ways to form a committee of 3 from 10](https://mathforums.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.362347/post-664313) $= \dbinom {10} 3 = \dfrac{10\cdot9\cdot8}{3!} = \color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}.$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}$ DIRECTLY? I'm surmising that $\color{springgreen}{10}$ refers to the original 10, and $\color{springgreen}{3}$ to the chosen 3. But what does $\color{springgreen}{4}$ mean?
#7: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-02-01T09:22:28Z (about 2 years ago)
  • Why ways to pick a 2-person committee from 4 people $3!$? Why aren't ways to form a 3-member committee from 8 people $8 \times 7 \times 6$?
  • How to intuit, construe ways to form a m-member committee from p people directly WITHOUT division or factorials?
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather, how can I calculate the final answer DIRECTLY, without division?**
  • ## Orange underline
  • 1. Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2} = 3!$ But how can I construe 3! DIRECTLY _WITHOUT DIVISION_? What does 3! mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write 3! explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Is this correct?
  • ## Red underline
  • 2. Unquestionably, ${\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!}}}$ = 8 × 7. But how can I construe 8 × 7 DIRECTLY _WITHOUT DIVISION_? What does 8 × 7 mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather, how can I deduce and intuit the final answer DIRECTLY, WITHOUT division or factorials?**
  • ## Orange underline
  • 1. Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2 = 3!}$ But how can I construe and intuit $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ wasn't one of the original numbers (2, 4) — what does $\color{darkorange}{3!}$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write 3! explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Did I surmise correctly?
  • ## Red underline
  • 2. Unquestionably, $\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!} = 8 × 7}$. But how can I construe and intuit $\color{red}{8 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{red}{7 } $ wasn't one of the original numbers of 3 or 8. What does $\color{red}{7 } $ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (David Patrick, p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • >
  • >![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • ## Examples 3 and 4
  • 3. I know [the ways to form a committee of 2 from 8](https://mathhelpforum.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.295777/post-975751) $= \dbinom8 2 = \dfrac{8\cdot7}{2!} = \color{violet}{4 × 7}.$ But again, how can I construe and intuit $\color{violet}{4 × 7}$ DIRECTLY? Note that $\color{violet}{4, 7}$ aren't the original numbers of 2, 8.
  • [4. I know [the ways to form a committee of 3 from 10](https://mathforums.com/threads/calculate-ways-to-form-a-committee-of-3-from-8-directly-without-%C3%B7.362347/post-664313) $= \dbinom {10} 3 = \dfrac{10\cdot9\cdot8}{3!} = \color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}.$ But again, how can I construe and intuit $\color{springgreen}{10 × 3 × 4}$ DIRECTLY? I'm surmising that $\color{springgreen}{10}$ refers to the original 10, and $\color{springgreen}{3}$ to the chosen 3. But what does $\color{springgreen}{4}$ mean?
#6: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-26T04:56:09Z (about 2 years ago)
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather, how can I calculate the final answer DIRECTLY, without division?**
  • ## Orange underline
  • Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2} = 3!$ But how can I construe 3! DIRECTLY _WITHOUT DIVISION_? What does 3! mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write $3!$ explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Is this correct?
  • ## Red underline
  • Unquestionably, ${\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!}}} = 8 \times 7$. But how can I construe 8 × 7 DIRECTLY _WITHOUT DIVISION_? What does 8 × 7 mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather, how can I calculate the final answer DIRECTLY, without division?**
  • ## Orange underline
  • 1. Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2} = 3!$ But how can I construe 3! DIRECTLY _WITHOUT DIVISION_? What does 3! mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write 3! explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Is this correct?
  • ## Red underline
  • 2. Unquestionably, ${\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!}}}$ = 8 × 7. But how can I construe 8 × 7 DIRECTLY _WITHOUT DIVISION_? What does 8 × 7 mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
#5: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-26T04:46:12Z (about 2 years ago)
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather, how can I calculate the final answer DIRECTLY, without factorials?**
  • ## Orange underline
  • Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2} = 3!$ But how can I construe 3! directly WITHOUT FACTORIALS? What does 3! mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write $3!$ explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Is this correct?
  • ## Red underline
  • Unquestionably, ${\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!}}} = 8 \times 7$. But how can I construe 8 × 7 directly, WITHOUT FACTORIALS? What does 8 × 7 mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather, how can I calculate the final answer DIRECTLY, without division?**
  • ## Orange underline
  • Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2} = 3!$ But how can I construe 3! DIRECTLY _WITHOUT DIVISION_? What does 3! mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write $3!$ explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Is this correct?
  • ## Red underline
  • Unquestionably, ${\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!}}} = 8 \times 7$. But how can I construe 8 × 7 DIRECTLY _WITHOUT DIVISION_? What does 8 × 7 mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
#4: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-26T04:44:54Z (about 2 years ago)
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. Rather, how can I calculate the final answer directly without any multiplication?
  • ## Red underline
  • Unquestionably, $\color{red}{4 \times 3/2} = 3!$ But why's $3!$ the answer? What does $3!$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write $3!$ explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Is this correct?
  • ## Purple underline
  • Unquestionably, ${\color{darkviolet}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!}}} = 8 \times 7$. But why's $8 \times 7$ the answer? What does $8 \times 7$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (p 38 bottom), the answer ought be $8 \times 7 \times 6$??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/ZiZjtsBPYFoQzu1EA1xq78Vz)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. **Rather, how can I calculate the final answer DIRECTLY, without factorials?**
  • ## Orange underline
  • Unquestionably, $\color{darkorange}{4 \times 3/2} = 3!$ But how can I construe 3! directly WITHOUT FACTORIALS? What does 3! mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write $3!$ explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Is this correct?
  • ## Red underline
  • Unquestionably, ${\color{red}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!}}} = 8 \times 7$. But how can I construe 8 × 7 directly, WITHOUT FACTORIALS? What does 8 × 7 mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (p 38 bottom), the answer ought be 8 × 7 × 6??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/t7nrZLrLSsEu2HAspWbrpx4E)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
#3: Question closed by user avatar Peter Taylor‭ · 2022-01-25T09:20:24Z (about 2 years ago)
#2: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-25T05:47:57Z (about 2 years ago)
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. Rather, how can I calculate the final answer directly without any multiplication?
  • ## Red underline
  • Unquestionably, $\color{red}{4 \times 3/2} = 3!$ But why's 3! the answer? What does 3! represent here?
  • Here's my surmisal. [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write $3!$ explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then there are 3 people left, so there are 3 ways to choose the second person in your 2-person committee? Is this correct?
  • ## Purple underline
  • Unquestionably, ${\color{darkviolet}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!}}} = 8 \times 7$. But why's $8 \times 7$ the answer? What does $8 \times 7$ represent here?
  • Here's my surmisal. There are 8 ways to pick the 1st committee member, and 7 ways to pick the 2nd member. But then wouldn't there be 6 ways to pick the 3rd member? By this Constructive Counting (p 38 bottom), the answer ought be $8 \times 7 \times 6$???
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/ZiZjtsBPYFoQzu1EA1xq78Vz)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
  • I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. Rather, how can I calculate the final answer directly without any multiplication?
  • ## Red underline
  • Unquestionably, $\color{red}{4 \times 3/2} = 3!$ But why's $3!$ the answer? What does $3!$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write $3!$ explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then of the 3 people left, you can pick the 2nd person in your 2-person committee in 3 ways. Is this correct?
  • ## Purple underline
  • Unquestionably, ${\color{darkviolet}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!}}} = 8 \times 7$. But why's $8 \times 7$ the answer? What does $8 \times 7$ mean?
  • **_Here's my surmisal._** You can pick the 1st committee member in 8 ways, and the 2nd member in 7 ways. But then can't you pick the 3rd member in 6 ways? By this Constructive Counting (p 38 bottom), the answer ought be $8 \times 7 \times 6$??? Why isn't there 6?
  • >**Problem 4.1:**
  • >
  • >(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the
  • order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)?
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/ZiZjtsBPYFoQzu1EA1xq78Vz)
  • David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon), PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar DNB‭ · 2022-01-25T05:46:05Z (about 2 years ago)
Why ways to pick a 2-person committee from 4 people $3!$? Why aren't ways to form a 3-member committee from 8 people $8 \times 7 \times 6$?
I grok, am NOT asking about, the answers below. Rather, how can I calculate the final answer directly without any multiplication?

## Red underline

Unquestionably, $\color{red}{4 \times 3/2} = 3!$ But why's 3! the answer? What does 3! represent here?

Here's my surmisal. [Blitzstein's solution hints to this calculation, but he didn't write $3!$ explicitly](https://math.codidact.com/posts/282608). You fix the first person. Then there are 3 people left, so there are 3 ways to choose the second person in your 2-person committee? Is this correct?

## Purple underline

Unquestionably, ${\color{darkviolet}{\dfrac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{3!}}} = 8 \times 7$. But why's $8 \times 7$ the answer? What does $8 \times 7$  represent here? 

Here's my surmisal. There are 8 ways to pick the 1st committee member, and 7 ways to pick the 2nd member. But then wouldn't there be 6 ways to pick the 3rd member? By this Constructive Counting (p 38 bottom), the answer ought be $8 \times 7 \times 6$??? 


>**Problem 4.1:**
>
>(b) In how many ways can a 2-person committee be chosen from a group of 4 people (where the 
order in which we choose the 2 people doesn't matter)? 


![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/ZiZjtsBPYFoQzu1EA1xq78Vz)

David Patrick, [BS Math & Computer Science, MS Math (Carnegie Mellon),  PhD Math (MIT)](https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/David_Patrick). *Introduction to Counting & Probability* (2005), pp 66-7.