Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#2: Post edited by user avatar DNB‭ · 2021-08-10T07:20:03Z (over 2 years ago)
  • ["Monty, who knows where the car is, then opens one of the two remaining doors. The door he opens always has a goat behind it (he never reveals the car!)."](https://math.codidact.com/posts/283113) So Monty must open the $M_j, j = 2,3$ with the goat, but not open the other $M_j$ with the car. So $P(M_2)
  • eq P(M_3)$!
  • 1. How then $P(M_2) = P(M_3) = 1/2$ and $P(\text{get car}|M_2)P(M_2) = P(\text{get car}|M_3)P(M_3)$? Please see the sentences underlined in red and purple.
  • 2. Please see the sentence underlined in green. How do you deduce the $2/3$ WITHOUT relying on the previous solution using the unconditional probability of success. Up to that sentence, you can deduce only that $P(\text{get car}) = \frac x2 + \frac x2 = x$.
  • >There's a subtlety though, which is that when the contestant chooses whether to
  • switch, she also knows which door Monty opened. We showed that the _unconditional_
  • probability of success is 2/3 (when following the switching strategy), but let's also
  • show that the _conditional_ probability of success for switching, given the information
  • that Monty provides, is also 2/3.
  • >Let $M_j$ be the event that Monty opens door j, for j = 2; 3. Then
  • >$P(\text{get car}) = P(\text{get car}|M_2)P(M_2) + P(\text{get car}|M_3)P(M_3)$;
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/YJXr1oLSEmNZ4bW9Lp5Wd331)
  • Blitzstein. *Introduction to Probability* (2019 2 ed). pp 69-70.
  • ["Monty, who knows where the car is, then opens one of the two remaining doors. The door he opens always has a goat behind it (he never reveals the car!)."](https://math.codidact.com/posts/283113) So Monty must open ONE of the $M_j (j = 2,3$), the one with the goat! But Monty mustn't and won't open the other $M_j$ with the car. So $P(M_2)
  • eq P(M_3)$!
  • 1. How then $P(M_2) = P(M_3) = 1/2$ and $P(\text{get car}|M_2)P(M_2) = P(\text{get car}|M_3)P(M_3)$? Please see the sentences underlined in red and purple.
  • 2. Please see the sentence underlined in green. How do you deduce the $2/3$ WITHOUT relying on the previous solution using the unconditional probability of success. Up to that sentence, you can deduce only that $P(\text{get car}) = \frac x2 + \frac x2 = x$.
  • >There's a subtlety though, which is that when the contestant chooses whether to
  • switch, she also knows which door Monty opened. We showed that the _unconditional_
  • probability of success is 2/3 (when following the switching strategy), but let's also
  • show that the _conditional_ probability of success for switching, given the information
  • that Monty provides, is also 2/3.
  • >Let $M_j$ be the event that Monty opens door j, for j = 2; 3. Then
  • >$P(\text{get car}) = P(\text{get car}|M_2)P(M_2) + P(\text{get car}|M_3)P(M_3)$;
  • ![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/YJXr1oLSEmNZ4bW9Lp5Wd331)
  • Blitzstein. *Introduction to Probability* (2019 2 ed). pp 69-70.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar DNB‭ · 2021-08-05T04:07:10Z (over 2 years ago)
How does P(Monty opens door 2) = P(Monty opens door 3), and $P(\text{get car}|M_2)P(M_2) = P(\text{get car}|M_3)P(M_3)$?
["Monty, who knows where the car is, then opens one of the two remaining doors. The door he opens always has a goat behind it (he never reveals the car!)."](https://math.codidact.com/posts/283113) So Monty must open the $M_j, j = 2,3$ with the goat, but not open the other $M_j$ with the car. So $P(M_2) \neq P(M_3)$!

1.  How then $P(M_2) = P(M_3) = 1/2$ and $P(\text{get car}|M_2)P(M_2) = P(\text{get car}|M_3)P(M_3)$? Please see the sentences  underlined in red and purple.

2. Please see the sentence underlined in green. How do you deduce the $2/3$ WITHOUT relying on the previous solution using the unconditional probability of success. Up to that sentence, you can deduce only that $P(\text{get car}) = \frac x2 + \frac x2 = x$. 

>There's a subtlety though, which is that when the contestant chooses whether to
switch, she also knows which door Monty opened. We showed that the _unconditional_
probability of success is 2/3 (when following the switching strategy), but let's also
show that the _conditional_ probability of success for switching, given the information
that Monty provides, is also 2/3.

>Let $M_j$ be the event that Monty opens door j, for j = 2; 3. Then

>$P(\text{get car}) = P(\text{get car}|M_2)P(M_2) + P(\text{get car}|M_3)P(M_3)$;

![Image alt text](https://math.codidact.com/uploads/YJXr1oLSEmNZ4bW9Lp5Wd331)

Blitzstein. *Introduction to Probability* (2019 2 ed). pp 69-70.