Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Rules of checking differentiability for Rolle's theorem

+1
−1

I was doing some exercises of Rolle's theorem. But, they didn't check the differentiability the way we checked differentiability normally. I am giving some examples.

When I was checking differentiability with limit (before differentiation) I was just putting $x$ values which given in question. Like $x=2$ check it is differentiable or not.

$$Rf'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x-h)-f(x)}{h}$$

I had put $2$ instead of $x$. But, something else is happening in Rolle's theorem.

Verify Rolle's theorem for the function $f(x) = x^2$ in the interval $[-1,1]$.

In answer they didn't change $x$.

Verify Rolle's theorem for the function $f(x) = x^{\frac{2}{3}}$ in the interval $(-1,1)$.

They had written $0$ instead of $x$ this time. I am confused how to find the value. In earlier problem it was closed interval. And, it is open interval now. Which law should I apply to find the value?

For the function $f(x)=x$ when $0 \leq x \leq 1$, $f(x) = 2-x$ when $1 < x \leq 2$, $f(0)=0=f(2)$, according to the Rolle's theorem there exist at least one point in the interval $(0,2)$ such that $f'(x)=0$ but $f'(x) \neq 0$ for any $x \in (0,2)$ why not, explain.

This time they had put $1$ instead of $x$.


I was solving some problems by myself. I noticed in question they gave us two value inside interval. I was trying to solve first problem (which I wrote here) with $-1$ instead of $x$ (as I said they used $x$ but, I tried to use $x$) than, I noticed that function is differentiable. To verify Rolle's theorem I needed a $x$ for that function. For Rolle's condition $f'(c)=0$. Without $x$ I can't solve the condition. Now, I think it's ok if I use $x$ always, isn't it?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »