Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#1: Initial revision by user avatar DNB‭ · 2021-07-09T05:59:52Z (almost 3 years ago)
You're sampling k people from a population of size n one at a time, with replacement and with equal probabilities. Order or not? 
If you're sampling k people from a population of size n one at a time, with replacement and with equal probabilities, then why does it matter whether your samples are ordered? The quotation below doesn't expound the pros and cons of ordering your samples or not. 

>1.4.23. The Bose-Einstein result should _not_ be used in the naive definition of
probability except in very special circumstances. For example, consider a survey
where a sample of size k is collected by choosing people from a population of size n one at a time, with replacement and with equal probabilities. Then the $n^k$ _ordered_
samples are equally likely, making the naive definition applicable, but the $\dbinom{n + k -1}{k}$ unordered samples (where all that matters is how many times each person was
sampled) are _not_ equally likely.

Blitzstein. *Introduction to Probability* (2019 2 ed). p 20.