Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#1: Initial revision by user avatar r~~‭ · 2021-05-08T20:07:17Z (almost 3 years ago)
If you work out deriving the quotient rule yourself using the exact trick you're highlighting, you can see that the quotient rule is nothing more than the product rule and the chain rule used together. If you rearrange a quotient to use the product rule, then you'll very likely be using the chain rule shortly thereafter on the $(\cdots)^{-1}$ part, and you will inevitably arrive at exactly the same result as if you had used the quotient rule but with more steps. The only potential difference is whether your result looks like $\frac{a}{b} + \frac{c}{b^2}$ or $\frac{ab + c}{b^2}$—but of course, as I'm sure you can see, that's no difference at all.