Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

70%
+5 −1
Meta Don't downvote just because someone posted screenshot.

1 answer  ·  posted 4y ago by TextKit‭  ·  edited 4y ago by manassehkatz‭

Question discussion
#4: Post edited by user avatar manassehkatz‭ · 2021-02-18T23:40:24Z (almost 4 years ago)
Correct typo! And change SHOUTING to **bold**.
Don't downvote just because someone posted screenshot. 
  • I've seen comments of admitting to downvoting a post just because that poster posted screenshots.
  • If someone is writing math, then they ought use MathJax, not screenshots.
  • But if you're quoting someone else, ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE ALLEGING SOMEONE ELSE MADE A TYPO OR MISTAKE, then screenshots are more reliable. I want to see what that person wrote exactly, not what you transcribed that person to write.
  • tack Exchange has too many questions when the issue is that a poster mistyped someone else's writing. If they didn't mistype, the poster wouldn't need to ask the question.
  • I've seen comments of admitting to downvoting a post just because that poster posted screenshots.
  • If someone is writing math, then they ought use MathJax, not screenshots.
  • But if you're quoting someone else, **especially if you are alleging someone else made a typo or mistake**, then screenshots are more reliable. I want to see what that person wrote exactly, not what you transcribed that person to write.
  • StackExchange has too many questions when the issue is that a poster mistyped someone else's writing. If they didn't mistype, the poster wouldn't need to ask the question.
#3: Post edited by user avatar TextKit‭ · 2021-02-18T22:13:34Z (almost 4 years ago)
  • I've seen comments of admitting to downvoting a post just because that poster posted screenshots.
  • If someone is writing math, then they ought use MathJax, not screenshots.
  • But if you're quoting someone else, ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE ALLEGING SOMEONE ELSE MADE A TYPO OR MISTAKE, then screenshots are more reliable. On Stack Exchange, I've seen too many questions when the issue is that a poster mistyped someone else's writing. If they didn't mistype, the poster wouldn't need to ask the question.
  • I've seen comments of admitting to downvoting a post just because that poster posted screenshots.
  • If someone is writing math, then they ought use MathJax, not screenshots.
  • But if you're quoting someone else, ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE ALLEGING SOMEONE ELSE MADE A TYPO OR MISTAKE, then screenshots are more reliable. I want to see what that person wrote exactly, not what you transcribed that person to write.
  • tack Exchange has too many questions when the issue is that a poster mistyped someone else's writing. If they didn't mistype, the poster wouldn't need to ask the question.
#2: Post edited by user avatar TextKit‭ · 2021-02-18T22:13:02Z (almost 4 years ago)
  • I've seen comments of admitting to downvoting a post just because that poster posted screenshots.
  • If someone is writing math, then they ought use MathJax, not screenshots.
  • But if you're quoting someone else, ESPECIALLY IF YOU THINK SOMEONE ELSE MADE A TYPO OR MISTAKE, then screenshots are more reliable. On Stack Exchange, I've seen too many questions when the issue is that a poster mistyped someone else's writing. If they didn't mistype, the poster wouldn't need to ask the question.
  • I've seen comments of admitting to downvoting a post just because that poster posted screenshots.
  • If someone is writing math, then they ought use MathJax, not screenshots.
  • But if you're quoting someone else, ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE ALLEGING SOMEONE ELSE MADE A TYPO OR MISTAKE, then screenshots are more reliable. On Stack Exchange, I've seen too many questions when the issue is that a poster mistyped someone else's writing. If they didn't mistype, the poster wouldn't need to ask the question.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar TextKit‭ · 2021-02-18T22:12:38Z (almost 4 years ago)
Don't downvote just because someone posted screenshot. 
I've seen comments of admitting to downvoting a post just because that poster posted screenshots. 

If someone is writing math, then they ought use MathJax, not screenshots.

But if you're quoting someone else, ESPECIALLY IF YOU THINK SOMEONE ELSE MADE A TYPO OR MISTAKE, then screenshots are more reliable. On Stack Exchange, I've seen too many questions when the issue is that a poster mistyped someone else's writing. If they didn't mistype, the poster wouldn't need to ask the question.