Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

#2: Post edited by user avatar nalply‭ · 2020-12-11T01:46:58Z (almost 4 years ago)
  • I think applying intuition based on dimensional analysis here will just serve to confuse rather than illuminate.
  • $$\frac{1}{\frac{\text{berry}}{\text{apple}}}$$
  • would simply read as 1 over berry per apple but that itself does not have much intuitive meaning. It means that you are dividing 'dimensionless' 1 by berries per apples even though this is in the end equivalent to apples per berry ($\frac{\text{apple}}{\text{berry}})$. This is simply not useful representation of a relationship.
  • Simply put not all representations of mathematical expressions are equally useful. Consider the following example:
  • $$y= 2x +10 \Leftrightarrow y-x -5 = x + 5 $$
  • In the equation of line on the left we can clearly interpret 2 as the slope of the equation and 10 as an intercept of the equation.
  • In the equation on the right that is completely equivalent to the one on the left we cannot directly any of the numbers.
  • I think applying intuition based on dimensional analysis here will just serve to confuse rather than illuminate.
  • $$\frac{1}{\frac{\text{berry}}{\text{apple}}}$$
  • would simply read as 1 over berry per apple but that itself does not have much intuitive meaning. It means that you are dividing 'dimensionless' 1 by berries per apples even though this is in the end equivalent to apples per berry ($\frac{\text{apple}}{\text{berry}})$. This is simply not an useful representation of a relationship.
  • Simply put, not all representations of mathematical expressions are equally useful. Consider the following example:
  • $$y= 2x +10 \Leftrightarrow y-x -5 = x + 5 $$
  • In the equation of line on the left we can clearly interpret 2 as the slope of the equation and 10 as an intercept of the equation.
  • In the equation on the right that is completely equivalent to the one on the left we cannot directly interpret any of the numbers.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar 1muflon1‭ · 2020-12-02T23:25:17Z (almost 4 years ago)
I think applying intuition based on dimensional analysis here will just serve to confuse rather than illuminate. 


$$\frac{1}{\frac{\text{berry}}{\text{apple}}}$$ 

would simply read as 1 over berry per apple but that itself does not have much intuitive meaning. It means that you are dividing 'dimensionless' 1 by berries per apples even though this is in the end equivalent to apples per berry ($\frac{\text{apple}}{\text{berry}})$. This is simply not useful representation of a relationship. 

Simply put not all representations of mathematical expressions are equally useful. Consider the following example:

$$y= 2x +10 \Leftrightarrow y-x -5 = x + 5 $$

In the equation of line on the left we can clearly interpret 2 as the slope of the equation and 10 as an intercept of the equation. 

In the equation on the right that is completely equivalent to the one on the left we cannot directly  any of the numbers.