Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

#2: Post edited by user avatar Canina‭ · 2020-10-09T11:21:39Z (over 3 years ago)
  • I don't see any difference between the rendering here and your Stack Exchange screenshot in the case of your overbrace and underbrace example.
  • For the commutative diagram example, the horizontal arrows ($A \rightarrow B$ and $C \rightarrow D$) don't appear perfectly straight, while in your screenshot from Stack Exchange, they do. If I right-click on the rendered math and select Math Settings -> Math Renderer -> SVG (the current default option being [CHTML](https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/options/output/chtml.html), which is HTML + CSS), the arrows look fine.
  • Is that what you are referring to?
  • It looks like the MathJax installation on Codidact is currently configured to use the CHTML renderer by default, but this is a setting that can be changed server-side. The section on [SVG Output Processor Options](https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/options/output/svg.html) in the manual looks like a good place to start.
  • I don't see any difference between the rendering here and your Stack Exchange screenshot in the case of your overbrace and underbrace example.
  • For the commutative diagram example, the horizontal arrows ($A \rightarrow B$ and $C \rightarrow D$) don't appear perfectly straight, while in your screenshot from Stack Exchange, they do. If I right-click on the rendered math and select Math Settings -> Math Renderer -> SVG (the current default option being [CHTML](https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/options/output/chtml.html), which is HTML + CSS), the arrows look fine.
  • Is that what you are referring to? If so, does switching to the SVG renderer resolve the issue for you as well, or does the issue remain?
  • If it does, which exact browser (browser, version, operating system and OS version) do you see this on?
  • It looks like the MathJax installation on Codidact is currently configured to use the CHTML renderer by default, but this is a setting that can be changed server-side. The section on [SVG Output Processor Options](https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/options/output/svg.html) in the manual looks like a good place to start.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Canina‭ · 2020-10-09T11:02:39Z (over 3 years ago)
I don't see any difference between the rendering here and your Stack Exchange screenshot in the case of your overbrace and underbrace example.

For the commutative diagram example, the horizontal arrows ($A \rightarrow B$ and $C \rightarrow D$) don't appear perfectly straight, while in your screenshot from Stack Exchange, they do. If I right-click on the rendered math and select Math Settings -> Math Renderer -> SVG (the current default option being [CHTML](https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/options/output/chtml.html), which is HTML + CSS), the arrows look fine.

Is that what you are referring to?

It looks like the MathJax installation on Codidact is currently configured to use the CHTML renderer by default, but this is a setting that can be changed server-side. The section on [SVG Output Processor Options](https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/options/output/svg.html) in the manual looks like a good place to start.