Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on The effect of measurement accuracy and rounding on hypothesis testing

Parent

The effect of measurement accuracy and rounding on hypothesis testing

+1
−0

I am checking the temperature I have at home with accuracy of one tenth of a grade (Celsius). The easily publicly available information is temperature in grades, with no decimals.

I am doing very basic hypothesis testing: My null hypothesis is that temperatures I measure do not have a systematic bias upwards or downwards from the public data, while my alternative hypothesis is that the temperatures I measure are systematically higher or systematically lower. I am doing a simple T-test and checking if the average of the differences is far from zero.

Does it make a difference whether I round my own measurements to integers, or, (essentially equivalently,) round the differences to integers? In particular, is there a bias in a particular direction, towards throwing away the null hypothesis or the opposite, if my data has more accuracy then what I am comparing it to?

Notes

This project breaks assumptions of hypothesis testing; at least independence of measurements and possibly the normal distribution of the differences.

The point of the question is not these, but rather the possible effect of rounding or different precision in the ground truth data and the measurements on the hypothesis test.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+2
−0

If the standard deviation of your measurements is in the trillions, then rounding to integers will make little difference – probably no practical difference – since the rounding error is so tiny by comparison to the value. If the standard deviation is $1/2$ then you would be throwing away huge amounts of information and your results will be wrong.

Generally you shouldn't round more than you have to until the last step.

And notice that $(20+\tfrac13)\times 3 = 60 + \left(\tfrac13\times3\right) = \text{exactly } 61,$

but $20.33\times3 = 60.99,$

So $61$ is an exactly answer and $60.99$ is a rounded answer.

If you show $61$ and $60.99$ to a person whose grasp of arithmetic is at a naive level, and as which one is rounded, they'll get it wrong.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Does this have a systematic effect on hypothesis testing, as per the question? (1 comment)
Does this have a systematic effect on hypothesis testing, as per the question?
tommi‭ wrote 4 months ago

Does this have a systematic effect on hypothesis testing, as per the question?