Comments on
Which other Real Analysis textbooks unusually recommend ending delta-epsilon proofs with a cluttered, bedecked ?
Post
Which other Real Analysis textbooks unusually recommend ending delta-epsilon proofs with a cluttered, bedecked ? [closed]
Closed as too generic by Mithical on May 17, 2023 at 03:48
This post contains multiple questions or has many possible indistinguishable correct answers or requires extraordinary long answers.
This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.
-
Most textbooks conclude
proofs tidily with alone, as in red beneath. But what's the official term for this alternative proof, as in green beneath? -
I forgot the particulars of another textbook that I read, not the one quoted below. It advises concluding
proofs with a littered, garnished as in red below, because it's quicker to define a new at the end (rather than working backwards to deduce byzantine, unkempt 's). Please recommend such textbooks?
Frank Morgan, Real Analysis (2005), pages 17-8.
1 comment thread