Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Endomorphisms on an entropic structure whose pointwise product is the identity automorphism - entropic idempotent structure?

Post

Endomorphisms on an entropic structure whose pointwise product is the identity automorphism - entropic idempotent structure?

+7
−0

Context: self-study from Warner's "Modern Algebra (1965): Exercise 16.27.

Let $\alpha$ and $\beta$ be endomorphisms of an entropic structure $(S, \odot)$ such that $\alpha \odot \beta$ is the identity automorphism, and let $\otimes$ be the operation on $S$ defined by: $$x \otimes y = \alpha (x) \odot \beta (y)$$ for all $x, y \in S$. Then $(S, \otimes)$ is an entropic idempotent algebraic structure.

An entropic structure is an algebraic structure $(S, \circ)$ such that $\circ$ is an entropic operation, that is:

$$\forall a, b, c, d \in S: (a \circ b) \circ (c \circ d) = (a \circ c) \circ (b \circ d)$$

Idempotence is trivial, but I'm having trouble proving entropicness.

Here is my attempt:

$(w \otimes x) \otimes (y \otimes z)$

$= (\alpha (w \otimes x) ) \odot (\beta (y \otimes z) )$

$= (\alpha (\alpha (w) \odot \beta (x))) \odot (\beta (\alpha (y) \odot \beta (z)))$

$= (\alpha (\alpha (w) ) \odot \alpha (\beta (x))) \odot (\beta (\alpha (y)) \odot \beta (\beta (z)))$ (justified by homomorphism)

$= (\alpha (\alpha (w) ) \odot \beta (\alpha (y))) \odot (\alpha (\beta (x)) \odot \beta (\beta (z)))$ (as $\odot$ is entropic)

$= (\alpha (w) \otimes \alpha (y)) \odot (\beta (x) \otimes \beta (z))$

If we can say that $\alpha (w) \otimes \alpha (y) = \alpha (w \otimes y)$ then we are home and dry, but I can't see why we can make that leap, as it is far from obvious that $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are endomorphisms on $(S, \otimes)$ in the same way that they are on $(S, \odot)$. Or are they? And why?

What is it I'm missing here?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

I don't know and right now can't see the answer, but the obvious point (which has probably already oc... (1 comment)
Could you please add the definition of an entropic structure? (2 comments)
I don't know and right now can't see the answer, but the obvious point (which has probably already oc...
Peter Taylor‭ wrote almost 2 years ago

I don't know and right now can't see the answer, but the obvious point (which has probably already occurred to you but which I make for completeness) is that you don't seem to have used the precondition "$\alpha \odot \beta$ is the identity automorphism".