Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on If $n = xm$ and $n \rightarrow \infty$, then $m \rightarrow \infty$?

Post

If $n = xm$ and $n \rightarrow \infty$, then $m \rightarrow \infty$?

+2
−1

Did Stewart prove the titular result, also underlined in green in the image below, either by himself or as an exercise, in Calculus Early Transcendentals or in the normal version Calculus?

I attempted the proof, but I got nonplussed. $\infty = \lim\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty} n = \lim\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty} xm $. Now what? The limit is for $n$, but my variables are $x$ and $m$.

  1. Show that $\lim\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty} (1 + \dfrac xn)^n = e^x$ for any $x > 0$.

James Stewart, Calculus Early Transcendentals  7 ed 2011. p. 223.

Transcription of image follows below:
56. Let $m = n/x$. Then $n = xm$, and as $n \to \infty$, $m \to \infty$.

Therefore, $\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} \left( 1 + \frac{x}{n} \right)^n = \lim_{m \to \infty} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{m} \right)^{mx} = \left[ \lim_{m \to \infty} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{m} \right)^m \right]^x = e^x$ by Equation 6.

James Stewart, Calculus Early Transcendentals, 7 ed. (2011) p. 223.

By the way, if I was writing the solution, I would've started with the game plan: rewriting $(1 + x/n)$ in the form $(1 + 1/\mathrm{something})^{\mathrm{something}}$ in order to apply $e = \lim\limits_{something \rightarrow \infty} (1 + 1/\mathrm{something})^{\mathrm{something}}$. It's superfluous to change variable to $m$. Just rewrite $(1 + x/n)$ as $\left(1 + \dfrac{1}{\frac nx}\right).$

But if you pined to change variable, I would've commenced with defining $\dfrac xn$ as $\dfrac 1 m$ which is more intuitive than "let $m = n/x$", because only $\dfrac xn$ shows up explicitly in the question. The question doesn't manifest $n/x$.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (5 comments)
General comments
Peter Taylor‭ wrote about 3 years ago · edited about 3 years ago

Do you have a definition of $\lim_{a \to \infty} f(a) = \infty$ in first order logic (i.e. as a simple statement with $\exists$ and $\forall$)?

TextKit‭ wrote about 3 years ago
r~~‭ wrote about 3 years ago

That won't do; that definition requires the limit to be a finite number, but you're working with an infinite limit.

Also, downvoted because once again, you're using images of text instead of writing your question such that no images are required.

TextKit‭ wrote about 3 years ago

@r~~ Do you mean https://i.imgur.com/i5jxtFW.jpg? "you're using images of text instead of writing your question such that no images are required" Images ARE required. I don't want to mis type the solution manual. I want to show you exactly what it says.

The Amplitwist‭ wrote about 3 years ago

Just transcribe the content of the image in addition to posting the image. It's good that you want to ensure that you're not mistyping the solution manual, but presenting text as images makes it difficult or impossible for people with accessibility issues to know what you're referring to.