Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Probability that six random numbers between 0 and 1 are the lengths of a tetrahedron's edges

Post

Probability that six random numbers between 0 and 1 are the lengths of a tetrahedron's edges

+5
−1

If six numbers are chosen at random, uniformly and independently, from the interval [0,1], what is the probability that they are the lengths of the edges of a tetrahedron?

This is Part 3 of Problem No. 81 of the Missouri State University's Advanced Problem Archive.

The website seems to have been last updated in 2015 and states that this problem is "still unsolved." Has this problem been solved since then?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Related on MathOverflow: Probability that a stick randomly broken in five places can form a tetrahedron (2 comments)
Broken link to Problem No. 81 (2 comments)
Broken link to Problem No. 81
The Amplitwist‭ wrote 2 months ago

The link to "Problem No. 81" seems to be broken, perhaps you could look into it.

JRN‭ wrote 2 months ago

Thank you for pointing this out. I have replaced the broken link with a working one.