Stewart, Clegg, Watson. *Calculus Early Transcendentals*, 2021, 9th edition. page 467. Problem 64.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e9f9/2e9f9c5d8a9d5872aae9d3d78aba4be95779bef4" alt=""
When I attempted this question, I thought I miffed, because my answer lacked R and r! Even after seeing the solution, I still can’t intuit why the napkin ring’s volume is independent of R and r. Before attempting any paperwork, how can a student forefeel that the napkin ring’s volume shall be independent of R and r ?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76fcf/76fcf612bed3f8e23ebb3215c83b2927cdf6ad7a" alt=""