Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Is it worth it to replace Arabic numerals with Kaktovik numerals?

+4
−3

is there is any advantage for Kaktovik numerals over Arabic numerals, if there is any can you explain to me in detail if I should replace Arabic numerals with Kaktovik numerals in my daily life?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

3 comment threads

Describe Kaktovik (1 comment)
Apparently the the Kaktovik numerals are a base 20 system with a sub-base of 5. Personally changing m... (2 comments)
Mathematics? (4 comments)

1 answer

+3
−0

For the vast majority of mathematics and other uses of numbers, the specific details of numeral system notation -- how to represent specific numbers -- make surprisingly little difference.

As far as I can tell, there are only 2 differences between Kaktovik numerals and the decimal numeral system: the base, and the specific shapes of the letters.

Base

Kaktovik numerals are a base-20 system, so they may be useful for transcribing numerals in the Iñupiaq language and other languages that express numbers in words that imply a base-20 system.

There has been a lot of thought about improving the traditional base-10 (decimal) system. I feel that most of the people I've read on this subject would agree that base-20 is theoretically overall better than base-10. Alas, most of the people I've read on this subject propose some other base that is even better than base-20 in some way -- even worse, they seem to disagree on exactly which base is best. Perhaps the most popular bases currently are:

  • dozenal has some strong arguments in its favor for human writing and speech: Dozenal FAQs
  • hexadecimal is better for finger-counting on human hands (in 2 very different ways)
  • octal
  • Base-2 and base-3 usually have the best radix economy when physically building calculating hardware.

shapes of the digits

In my opinion, the 3 most important design characteristics of written digit symbols are (in order of importance):

  1. Readability
  2. Writability
  3. Learnability

Let's start with Learnability:

"They are visually iconic, with shapes that indicate the number being represented." -- Kaktovik numerals

That's clearly much better for people learning the system than traditional decimal digits, who must spend more time memorizing the apparently arbitrary shapes of the traditional decimal digits and their apparently arbitrary mapping to values.

A few other sets of digit symbols also have this nice property of the symbol logically reflecting the value of the digit:

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »